CVE-2025-49330
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDeserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in CRM Perks Integration for Contact Form 7 and Zoho CRM, Bigin cf7-zoho allows Object Injection.This issue affects Integration for Contact Form 7 and Zoho CRM, Bigin: from n/a through <= 1.3.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe CRM Perks cf7-zoho plugin <= 1.3.0 has a deserialization vulnerability where untrusted data is unsafely processed, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary PHP objects. Depending on what classes exist in the plugin, this could enable remote code execution via magic method invocation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the cf7-zoho plugin installationCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named cf7-zoho, cf7-zoho-crm, or similar. Also check the WordPress admin plugin list.Affected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (usually named cf7-zoho.php or similar in the plugin folder) and locate the plugin header comment containing 'Version:' or check the version recorded in WordPress admin under Plugins > Installed Plugins.Affected if The version listed is 1.3.0 or lower
-
Determine if the plugin is activeIn WordPress admin, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins and verify whether the cf7-zoho plugin is activated.Affected if The plugin is currently active and processing form submissions
-
Assess exposure to untrusted inputExamine if the plugin is configured to receive form submissions from the public. If Contact Form 7 forms are set up to send data to Zoho via this plugin, the deserialization endpoint is reachable.Affected if CF7 forms are configured to use the plugin for CRM integration and are publicly accessible
A user is affected if the cf7-zoho plugin is installed, active, and running version 1.3.0 or lower while processing external form submissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of the plugin (> 1.3.0) immediately. If no patch is available, disable the plugin and consider alternative CRM integration solutions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49330 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49330 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data