Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-49406

HIGH · 8.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
91/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in favethemes Houzez allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs. This issue affects Houzez: from n/a through 4.1.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing Authorization vulnerability in favethemes Houzez theme allows unauthenticated or unauthorized users to access functionality that should be protected by access control lists (ACLs). This is a Broken Access Control (BAC) issue where the theme fails to properly verify user permissions before executing certain functions.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks ( capability checks or role verification) on all sensitive functionality in the Houzez theme, ensuring that users can only access features they're permitted to use based on their role and capabilities.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Houzez theme installation
    Check your WordPress theme directory (wp-content/themes/) for the presence of the 'houzez' theme folder. Look for theme files like style.css which typically contain the theme name and version in the header comments.
    Affected if The Houzez theme by favethemes is installed on the WordPress site
  2. Identify sensitive theme functionality
    Review the theme's PHP files for functions that handle user data, property submissions, agent management, or other administrative actions. Look for action hooks (add_action) and callback functions that process sensitive operations.
    Affected if The theme contains functionality that should require authorization (e.g., user management, property CRUD operations, settings changes)
  3. Test for unauthenticated access to sensitive endpoints
    Attempt to access theme-specific AJAX actions or form submissions without providing authentication credentials. Check common endpoints like admin-ajax.php?action=houzez_ and other theme-specific action parameters.
    Affected if Sensitive theme functions respond successfully to unauthenticated requests without returning authorization errors
  4. Verify role and capability checks exist
    Inspect theme PHP files for proper authorization checks using functions like current_user_can(), check_admin_referer(), or similar WordPress capability verification functions before executing sensitive operations.
    Affected if Theme code lacks capability checks (current_user_can) or nonce verification before executing functions that modify data or access sensitive information
  5. Check user role configuration
    In WordPress admin, navigate to Users > Users and verify which user roles exist. Also check if any custom roles created by Houzez (like 'houzez_agent' or 'houzez_owner') have elevated permissions that may be improperly exposed.
    Affected if Custom Houzez user roles with elevated permissions exist and theme functionality does not properly validate these roles

A site is affected if the Houzez theme is installed and sensitive functions can be accessed or executed without proper user authorization or capability verification.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks ( capability checks or role verification) on all sensitive functionality in the Houzez theme, ensuring that users can only access features they're permitted to use based on their role and capabilities.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49406 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49406 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data