CVE-2025-49418
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in TeconceTheme Allmart allmart-core allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Allmart: from n/a through <= 1.0.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the TeconceTheme Allmart allmart-core plugin allows remote attackers to induce the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal or external resources. The vulnerability exists in a component that processes user-supplied URLs without proper validation, potentially enabling access to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or internal network infrastructure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the allmart-core plugin installationSearch the web server filesystem for the allmart-core plugin directory. Common paths include /wp-content/plugins/ for WordPress or /themes/allmart/ for theme-based installations. Check for files named allmart-core.php or similar.Affected if The allmart-core plugin or theme from TeconceTheme Allmart is present on the server
-
Identify the installed versionExamine plugin/theme header files for version metadata. Look for a 'Version:' comment or changelog file within the allmart plugin directory. Compare the found version against any known version ranges for the fix.Affected if The installed version predates the patched version and falls within the affected range
-
Identify URL processing endpointsSearch the plugin files for functions that handle user-supplied URLs. Look for code patterns involving $_GET, $_POST, or request parameters being passed to functions like file_get_contents, curl_exec, wp_remote_get, or similar HTTP request functions.Affected if URL processing code that accepts user input exists in the plugin
-
Verify the vulnerable parameter is accessibleReview the identified URL handling code to determine if the vulnerable parameter is exposed via GET or POST requests without authentication or validation requirements.Affected if The URL parameter can be supplied by unauthenticated users or lacks server-side validation checks
-
Test for SSRF in staging if applicableIf a non-production staging environment exists, attempt to supply an internal endpoint URL (such as http://169.254.169.254/ or http://localhost/) to the identified parameter and observe if the server makes a request to that internal resource.Affected if The server successfully retrieves content from internal endpoints when supplied via the identified parameter
The environment is affected if the allmart-core plugin is installed and contains URL processing functionality accessible to users without proper validation of the supplied URL parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist-based validation for all URL parameters, restrict accessible protocols to HTTPS only, and consider network segmentation to limit the impact of SSRF exploitation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49418 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49418 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data