CVE-2025-49452
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Adrian Ladó PostaPanduri postapanduri allows SQL Injection.This issue affects PostaPanduri: from n/a through <= 2.1.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL Injection vulnerability in PostaPanduri <= 2.1.3 allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through improper neutralization of special elements in database queries. The critical CVSS score of 9.3 indicates potential for complete compromise of the database, including unauthorized data exfiltration, modification, or administrative operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm PostaPanduri application presenceIdentify whether the PostaPanduri application is installed in your environment by checking application directories, deployed packages, or running processesAffected if PostaPanduri is present and handles user input through database queries
-
Determine installed versionLocate and read the version identifier for your PostaPanduri installation (typically in version files, about pages, or application metadata)Affected if The installed version falls within any affected version range if such ranges are documented elsewhere
-
Identify database interaction codeSearch the PostaPanduri codebase for files containing SQL query execution patterns, particularly where user-supplied parameters are passed to database functionsAffected if Dynamic SQL queries exist that incorporate user input without sanitization
-
Inspect input handling on data entry pointsReview forms, API endpoints, or other interfaces where users submit data that flows to database queriesAffected if User-provided input is directly concatenated or interpolated into SQL statements without validation or parameterization
-
Verify parameterized query usageExamine database query code to determine whether prepared statements or parameterized queries are implemented, or if string concatenation is used to build SQL commandsAffected if SQL queries are constructed using string concatenation or formatting functions with user input rather than bound parameters
You are affected if the PostaPanduri application uses dynamic SQL queries that incorporate unsanitized user input without parameterized statements or input validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries/prepared statements throughout the application, implement strict input validation, and apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49452 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49452 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data