CVE-2025-4966
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe WP Online Users Stats plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.0. This is due to missing nonce validation within the hk_dataset_results() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe WP Online Users Stats WordPress plugin lacks nonce validation in its hk_dataset_results() function, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge administrative requests. By tricking a site admin into clicking a malicious link, attackers can inject arbitrary web scripts that execute in the admin's browser session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm plugin installationIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'WP Online Users Stats' or 'Hk1993 Wp Online Users Stats'. Alternatively, check the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for a folder named similar to 'wp-online-users-stats' or 'hk-online-users-stats'.Affected if The plugin is not installed on the WordPress site
-
Identify installed versionIn WordPress admin, find the plugin in the Plugins list and check the version number displayed beneath the plugin name. Or open the main plugin PHP file (usually named index.php or the plugin slug) and look for a Version header in the plugin comments at the top.Affected if The installed version is 1.0.0 or any version below it (the affected range is <= 1.0.0)
-
Locate the vulnerable functionUsing a file manager or FTP, navigate to the plugin directory and search for the function 'hk_dataset_results' in the PHP files. Common paths: /wp-content/plugins/wp-online-users-stats/ or similar.Affected if The function hk_dataset_results() exists in the plugin code
-
Check for nonce validationOpen the PHP file containing hk_dataset_results() and examine the function code. Look for calls to wp_verify_nonce(), check_admin_referer(), or nonce verification within the function.Affected if No nonce verification (such as wp_verify_nonce or check_admin_referer) is present in the hk_dataset_results() function
A site is affected if the WP Online Users Stats plugin is installed with version 1.0.0 or lower AND the hk_dataset_results() function lacks WordPress nonce verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate to a patched version when available, or add WordPress nonce verification to the hk_dataset_results() function to validate request authenticity before processing.
Version 1.0.1 or later (check wordpress.org for current stable release)
- Navigate to the WordPress admin dashboard
- Go to Plugins > Installed Plugins
- Locate 'WP Online Users Stats' in the plugin list
- Check if an update is available for the plugin
- If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the latest version
- If no update appears, manually download the latest version from wordpress.org/plugins/wp-online-users-stats/ and reinstall
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4966 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4966 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data