CVE-2025-49668
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code by sending specially crafted network packets to the affected service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2all versions= r2< 10.0.14393.8246< 10.0.17763.7558< 10.0.20348.3932< 10.0.25398.1732< 10.0.26100.4652CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RRAS service statusOpen Services console (services.msc) or run 'Get-Service RemoteAccess' in PowerShell. Check if the Remote Access service (RRAS) is installed and running.Affected if RRAS is installed and running - the vulnerability only affects systems with RRAS enabled
-
Confirm Windows Server versionRun 'winver' or execute 'Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object WindowsProductName, WindowsVersion' in PowerShell. Note the exact build number (e.g., 10.0.14393.xxxx).Affected if Version cannot be determined or does not match the affected Windows Server products listed
-
Compare against affected version rangesExecute 'systeminfo' or check the version from step 2. Compare your full build number (e.g., 10.0.14393.8246) against the affected ranges: Server 2016 < 10.0.14393.8246, Server 2019 < 10.0.17763.7558, Server 2022 < 10.0.20348.3932, Server 2022 23h2 < 10.0.25398.1732, Server 2025 < 10.0.26100.4652. Server 2008/2012 all versions are affected.Affected if Your Windows Server build number falls within an affected range or you are on Server 2008/2012 with RRAS enabled
-
Assess network exposureCheck if RRAS ports are exposed to untrusted networks. Review firewall rules for RRAS-related services (typically ports associated with Routing and Remote Access). Use 'netsh advfirewall firewall show rule name=all' or check VPN/RRAS firewall rules.Affected if RRAS is accessible from untrusted networks - this is required for remote exploitation
You are affected if RRAS is enabled AND your Windows Server version falls within the affected build ranges (or is Server 2008/2012) AND the service is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.824610.0.17763.755810.0.20348.3932
Apply Microsoft security updates for RRAS when available; if RRAS is not required, disable the service; implement network-level filtering to restrict exposure to untrusted networks.
Windows Server 2016 to build 10.0.14393.8246 or later; 2019 to build 10.0.17763.7558 or later; 2022 to build 10.0.20348.3932 or later; 2022 23h2 to build 10.0.25398.1732 or later; 2025 to build 10.0.26100.4652 or later
- 1. Identify the current Windows Server version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- 2. Determine if your server version is affected by comparing the build number to the fixed versions: Windows Server 2016 (10.0.14393.8246), 2019 (10.0.17763.7558), 2022 (10.0.20348.3932), 2022 23h2 (10.0.25398.1732), 2025 (10.0.26100.4652)
- 3. For Windows Server 2008/2012 (all versions): These are end-of-life; migrate to a supported Windows Server version
- 4. For affected versions: Apply the appropriate Microsoft security update via Windows Update, WSUS, or download from Microsoft Update Catalog
- 5. Restart the server as required by the update
- 6. Verify the RRAS service is functioning correctly after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49668 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49668 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data