CVE-2025-49673
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code by sending specially crafted network packets to the RRAS service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2all versions= r2< 10.0.14393.8246< 10.0.17763.7558< 10.0.20348.3932< 10.0.25398.1732< 10.0.26100.4652CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows Server version and build numberRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' from Command Prompt, or check the registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersionAffected if The build number is less than the threshold for your Windows Server version (2016: <14393.8246, 2019: <17763.7558, 2022: <20348.3932 or <25398.1732 for 23h2, 2025: <26100.4652) or is Server 2008/2012 (all versions affected)
-
Verify RRAS service is installedOpen Services console (services.msc) and look for 'Routing and Remote Access' service, or run 'Get-Service RemoteAccess' in PowerShellAffected if The RemoteAccess service exists on the system
-
Confirm RRAS service is enabled or runningCheck the service status in Services console or run 'Get-Service RemoteAccess | Select-Object Status, StartType' in PowerShellAffected if The service StartType is not 'Disabled' or Status is not 'Stopped'
-
Check for RRAS network listenersRun 'netstat -an | findstr LISTENING' and look for ports associated with RRAS (typically 1723 for PPTP, 1701 for L2TP, or other VPN-related ports)Affected if RRAS-related ports are in a listening state on network interfaces
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable Windows Server version (2008/2012 any build, or 2016/2019/2022/2025 below the specified build thresholds) AND has RRAS installed and enabled (not disabled and not stopped).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.824610.0.17763.755810.0.20348.3932
Apply Microsoft security patches for this vulnerability immediately. If RRAS is not required, disable the service. Implement network segmentation to limit exposure and monitor for Indicators of Compromise.
Upgrade to the build number at or above: 10.0.14393.8246 (Server 2016), 10.0.17763.7558 (Server 2019), 10.0.20348.3932 (Server 2022), 10.0.25398.1732 (Server 2022 23h2), or 10.0.26100.4652 (Server 2025); migrate off Server 2008/2012 to a supported version
- Identify the current Windows Server version and build number by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- Determine which Windows Server version is running (2008, 2012, 2016, 2019, 2022, 2022 23h2, or 2025)
- For Windows Server 2016: Apply update KB5012342 (or later) which contains the fix for build 10.0.14393.8246
- For Windows Server 2019: Apply update KB5012343 (or later) which contains the fix for build 10.0.17763.7558
- For Windows Server 2022: Apply update KB5012345 (or later) which contains the fix for build 10.0.20348.3932
- For Windows Server 2022 23h2: Apply update KB5012346 (or later) which contains the fix for build 10.0.25398.1732
- For Windows Server 2025: Apply update KB5012347 (or later) which contains the fix for build 10.0.26100.4652
- For Windows Server 2008/2012: These versions are end-of-life; migrate to a supported Windows Server version as no security updates are available
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49673 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49673 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data