CVE-2025-49681
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds read in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn out-of-bounds read vulnerability exists in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to read memory contents beyond allocated buffer boundaries, potentially exposing sensitive information from the server's memory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2all versions= r2< 10.0.14393.8246< 10.0.17763.7558< 10.0.20348.3932< 10.0.25398.1732< 10.0.26100.4652CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows Server version and build numberRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the exact build number (e.g., 10.0.14393.8246)Affected if The build number is below any of these thresholds: 10.0.14393.8246 (Server 2016), 10.0.17763.7558 (Server 2019), 10.0.20348.3932 (Server 2022), 10.0.25398.1732 (Server 2022 23h2), 10.0.26100.4652 (Server 2025), or if running Server 2008/2012 (any build)
-
Verify RRAS is installed on the systemRun 'Get-WindowsFeature -Name *Routing*' in PowerShell, or check for the presence of the 'RemoteAccess' service via 'Get-Service | Where-Object {$_.Name -eq "RemoteAccess"}'Affected if The RemoteAccess (RRAS) Windows feature is installed or the RemoteAccess service exists on the system
-
Confirm RRAS service is enabled or runningRun 'Get-Service RemoteAccess' to check the service status; also check registry key 'HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\RemoteAccess' to see if the service is configuredAffected if The RemoteAccess service is present, enabled, or running (even if currently stopped, the binary is still vulnerable if the version is unpatched)
-
Identify the specific Windows Server editionRun 'systeminfo' or check 'winrm id' output to confirm whether the system is Standard, Datacenter, or a specific variant like Server 2022 23h2Affected if The system is an affected edition (Standard, Datacenter, etc.) running a vulnerable build as determined in step 1
The system is vulnerable if it is any version of Windows Server 2008/2012, or a later Server version with a build number lower than the patched thresholds AND has the RRAS/RemoteAccess component installed, regardless of whether the service is currently running.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.824610.0.17763.755810.0.20348.3932
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-49681 when released. If RRAS is not required, consider disabling the service to reduce attack surface.
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-49681 via Windows Update (check MSRC for the specific KB article)
- Open Windows Update on the affected server
- Check for available security updates
- Install the relevant cumulative update for your Windows Server version that addresses CVE-2025-49681
- Restart the server if prompted
- Verify the RRAS service is running correctly after restart
- Confirm the installed build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your server (Server 2016: 10.0.14393.8246, Server 2019: 10.0.17763.7558, Server 2022: 10.0.20348.3932, Server 2022 23h2: 10.0.25398.1732, Server 2025: 10.0.26100.4652)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49681 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49681 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data