CVE-2025-49729
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via specially crafted network requests to the RRAS service, which listens on the network.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2all versions= r2< 10.0.14393.8246< 10.0.17763.7558< 10.0.20348.3932< 10.0.25398.1732< 10.0.26100.4652CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RRAS is installedOpen Server Manager > Add Roles and Features > check if 'Remote Access' role with 'Routing' role service is installed, or run: Get-WindowsFeature -Name RemoteAccessAffected if RRAS role is installed on the server
-
Check RRAS service statusOpen Services.msc and locate 'Routing and Remote Access' service, or run: Get-Service RemoteAccessAffected if The RemoteAccess service is running (status = 'Running')
-
Confirm RRAS is listening on networkRun netstat -an | findstr ':1723' or check for listening ports associated with RRAS (PPTP port 1723, GRE protocol 47)Affected if RRAS is listening on any network interface (not loopback only)
-
Identify Windows Server versionRun winver, or: [System.Environment]::OSVersion.Version, or check systeminfo | findstr /C:"OS Version"Affected if Version falls within affected ranges: Server 2008/2012 (all), Server 2016 < 10.0.14393.8246, Server 2019 < 10.0.17763.7558, Server 2022 < 10.0.20348.3932, Server 2022 23h2 < 10.0.25398.1732, Server 2025 < 10.0.26100.4652
-
Verify security update is NOT installedRun: Get-HotFix | Where-Object {$_.Description -match 'Security Update'} or check Windows Update history for CVE-2025-49729Affected if The specific security patch for CVE-2025-49729 is not installed
Server is affected if RRAS is installed, running, listening on network, and the Windows version is below the fixed builds AND the CVE-2025-49729 security update is not installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.824610.0.17763.755810.0.20348.3932
Apply Microsoft security updates for CVE-2025-49729 when released; if RRAS is not required, disable the service to eliminate the attack surface.
Apply Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-49729 (build numbers: Server 2016 = 10.0.14393.8246, Server 2019 = 10.0.17763.7558, Server 2022 = 10.0.20348.3932, Server 2022 23h2 = 10.0.25398.1732, Server 2025 = 10.0.26100.4652)
- Check current Windows Server build version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in command prompt
- Open Windows Update or check Microsoft Update Catalog for the latest security updates
- Search for and install the Microsoft security update corresponding to CVE-2025-49729 (may be part of a monthly cumulative update)
- Restart the server if prompted by the update installation
- Verify the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version threshold for your Windows Server version
- If RRAS is not needed, consider disabling the Routing and Remote Access Service to reduce attack surface using 'netsh routing ip disbled' or through Services console
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49729 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49729 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data