CVE-2025-49812
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn some mod_ssl configurations on Apache HTTP Server versions through to 2.4.63, an HTTP desynchronisation attack allows a man-in-the-middle attacker to hijack an HTTP session via a TLS upgrade. Only configurations using "SSLEngine optional" to enable TLS upgrades are affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.4.64, which removes support for TLS upgrade.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn HTTP desynchronization vulnerability in mod_ssl affects Apache HTTP Server versions through 2.4.63 when using 'SSLEngine optional' to enable TLS upgrades. A man-in-the-middle attacker can hijack HTTP sessions by manipulating the TLS upgrade handshake, causing desynchronization between client and server state.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.4.64CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Apache HTTP Server versionRun 'apache2 -v' (Debian/Ubuntu) or 'httpd -v' (RHEL/CentOS) to determine the installed versionAffected if Version is 2.4.63 or earlier (any version < 2.4.64)
-
Verify mod_ssl module is loadedRun 'apache2ctl -M | grep ssl' or 'httpd -M | grep ssl' to confirm mod_ssl is activeAffected if mod_ssl module is present in the loaded modules list
-
Search for SSLEngine optional directiveSearch SSL configuration files (commonly /etc/apache2/mods-available/ssl.conf, /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf, or SSL virtual host config files) for the string 'SSLEngine optional' using grep -rAffected if The directive 'SSLEngine optional' is found in any Apache SSL configuration file
-
Identify SSL virtual host configurationsReview all virtual host configuration files containing SSL settings (typically in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/ or /etc/httpd/conf.d/) and check if any use SSLEngine optionalAffected if Any SSL-enabled virtual host uses 'SSLEngine optional' instead of 'SSLEngine on' or 'SSLEngine off'
User is affected if running Apache HTTP Server version < 2.4.64 with mod_ssl loaded AND 'SSLEngine optional' is configured in any SSL virtual host or configuration file.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.4.64
Upgrade to Apache HTTP Server 2.4.64 which removes TLS upgrade support, or disable 'SSLEngine optional' configurations to prevent TLS upgrades.
2.4.64
- Check current Apache HTTP Server version (e.g., `apache2 -v` or `httpd -v`)
- Stop the Apache service (e.g., `systemctl stop apache2` or `systemctl stop httpd`)
- Upgrade Apache HTTP Server to version 2.4.64 using your package manager or by compiling from source (e.g., `apt-get update && apt-get install apache2` on Debian/Ubuntu, or `yum update httpd` on RHEL/CentOS)
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version (`apache2 -v` or `httpd -v`)
- Ensure any SSL/TLS configuration is reviewed - note that "SSLEngine optional" is no longer supported and should be changed to "SSLEngine on" or "SSLEngine off" as appropriate for your configuration
- Start the Apache service (e.g., `systemctl start apache2` or `systemctl start httpd`)
- Verify the server is running and functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49812 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49812 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data