ConjurApplication · Cyberark

CVE-2025-49831

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.22.1 / 13.5.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An attacker of Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted installations that route traffic from Secrets Manager to AWS through a misconfigured network device can reroute authentication requests to a malicious server under the attacker’s control. CyberArk believes there to be very few installations where this issue can be actively exploited, though Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise) prior to versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 and Conjur OSS prior to version 1.22.1 may be affected. Conjur OSS version 1.22.1 and Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted versions 13.5.1 and 13.6.1 fix the issue.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A man-in-the-middle vulnerability in Secrets Manager Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise) and Conjur OSS allows attackers to intercept and reroute authentication requests destined for AWS through misconfigured network devices to a malicious server under the attacker's control.

MitigationUpdate to Conjur OSS version 1.22.1 or Secrets Manager Self-Hosted versions 13.5.1/13.6.1, and review network routing configurations to ensure traffic to AWS cannot be diverted through untrusted network devices.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ConjurApplication
Affected:< 1.22.1< 13.5.1= 13.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Conjur version
    Check the running Conjur version through the UI, API, or container/tag metadata. Common methods include: conjur --version, checking Docker image tags, or querying the Conjur API at /info endpoint.
    Affected if The installed version is less than 1.22.1 for Conjur OSS, or less than 13.5.1 (or exactly 13.6) for Secrets Manager Self-Hosted/Conjur Enterprise.
  2. Determine if AWS authentication is configured
    Review Conjur policy files and configuration to identify whether any AWS IAM role-based authentication is enabled. Check for AWS-related authenticator definitions in the policy tree.
    Affected if AWS authenticator module is enabled and configured, meaning authentication requests to AWS are being made from this Conjur instance.
  3. Inspect network routing to AWS endpoints
    Review network configuration, routing tables, and proxy settings to trace how traffic from Conjur reaches AWS IAM endpoints (such as sts.amazonaws.com). Check for any intermediary devices, proxies, or VPN configurations that could divert traffic.
    Affected if Network paths to AWS can be intercepted by untrusted devices or redirected through attacker-controlled infrastructure due to weak routing controls.
  4. Verify TLS/SSL inspection configurations
    Examine whether any network devices (proxies, firewalls, load balancers) between Conjur and AWS are performing TLS interception or SSL inspection that could expose credentials to a MITM attack.
    Affected if TLS inspection by untrusted or misconfigured network devices is present between Conjur and AWS services.

You are affected if your Conjur version falls within the vulnerable range AND AWS authentication is configured with network paths that could allow an attacker to intercept traffic to AWS endpoints.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.22.1 / 13.5.1 or later
Fixed in 1.22.113.5.1
Interim mitigation

Update to Conjur OSS version 1.22.1 or Secrets Manager Self-Hosted versions 13.5.1/13.6.1, and review network routing configurations to ensure traffic to AWS cannot be diverted through untrusted network devices.

Recommended fix High confidence

Conjur OSS: 1.22.1; Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted: 13.5.1 or 13.6.1

  1. Identify which Conjur product is in use: Conjur OSS or Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted (formerly Conjur Enterprise)
  2. Check current installed version to confirm it is affected (Conjur OSS < 1.22.1, Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted < 13.5.1, or Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted = 13.6)
  3. For Conjur OSS: Plan upgrade to version 1.22.1
  4. For Secrets Manager, Self-Hosted: Plan upgrade to version 13.5.1 or 13.6.1
  5. Review upgrade documentation and perform backup of configuration and data
  6. Execute upgrade following standard Conjur upgrade procedures
  7. Verify the upgrade was successful and the version is correct
  8. Test authentication flows to confirm the fix is working

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Conjur Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49831 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49831 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data