CVE-2025-49895
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in iThemes ServerBuddy by PluginBuddy.Com allows Object Injection.This issue affects ServerBuddy by PluginBuddy.Com: from n/a through 1.0.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in iThemes ServerBuddy plugin allows authenticated attackers to forge requests that trigger PHP object injection, potentially leading to remote code execution if suitable magic methods exist in the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate iThemes ServerBuddy plugin filesCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins) for a folder named 'serverbuddy' or similar iThemes ServerBuddy installationAffected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress plugins directory
-
Read the plugin versionOpen the main plugin file (usually serverbuddy.php or index.php inside the plugin folder) and locate the Version header in the plugin comment blockAffected if The installed version matches or falls within the affected version range (compare your version to the known vulnerable versions)
-
Verify plugin is activeQuery the WordPress options table (wp_options) for the option_name 'active_plugins', or use WP-CLI: wp plugin list --status=active --format=jsonAffected if ServerBuddy appears in the list of active plugins
-
Check for nonce implementationExamine the plugin PHP files that handle form submissions or AJAX actions; look for wp_verify_nonce() or check_admin_referer() calls before processing requestsAffected if No nonce verification is found on state-changing actions, indicating the CSRF protection is missing
The environment is affected if iThemes ServerBuddy plugin is installed, active, and lacks proper CSRF nonce validation on vulnerable endpoints, allowing object injection via forged authenticated requests
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement WordPress nonces on all forms and AJAX actions; validate nonce tokens before processing any state-changing requests; consider disabling the plugin until a patched version is available.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49895 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49895 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data