CVE-2025-49942
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in AncoraThemes Gardis gardis allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Gardis: from n/a through <= 1.2.13.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceLocal File Inclusion vulnerability in AncoraThemes Gardis theme allows attackers to manipulate file include statements to execute arbitrary PHP code. The vulnerability stems from improper input validation on file path parameters, potentially enabling directory traversal and remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Gardis theme is installedCheck the theme directory (typically /wp-content/themes/gardis/ or similar path depending on CMS) and verify the theme exists and is activeAffected if Gardis theme is present and enabled in the environment
-
Determine installed Gardis theme versionLocate and read the theme's style.css, functions.php, or version.php file to find the version number declared in the theme metadataAffected if Version cannot be determined or is older than the patched version
-
Locate file inclusion functions using user inputSearch theme PHP files (especially functions.php, header.php, footer.php, template files) for include, require, include_once, require_once statements that incorporate request parameters ($_GET, $_POST, $_REQUEST)Affected if Any include/require statements directly use unsanitized user-supplied input for file paths
-
Test for directory traversal in file path parametersIdentify URL parameters used in file inclusion (e.g., ?file=, ?page=, ?template=) and inspect the code handling them; verify whether the application sanitizes or blocks ../ sequences and null bytesAffected if Parameters accept directory traversal sequences without proper validation or filtering
-
Review template/partial inclusion logicExamine any dynamic template loading mechanisms in the theme that construct file paths from user input, checking if paths are restricted to an allowed directoryAffected if Dynamic template loading allows paths outside the intended theme directory
The environment is affected if Gardis theme is installed and contains file inclusion code that uses unsanitized user input, allowing directory traversal.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Gardis theme to latest patched version immediately. If no patch exists, disable the theme, implement web application firewall rules to block directory traversal patterns (../, null byte injection), and manually audit code for insecure include/require statements using user-supplied input.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49942 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49942 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data