CVE-2025-49949
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in templazee Templazee templazee allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Templazee: from n/a through <= 1.0.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing Authorization vulnerability in Templazee theme allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized access to certain functions or data due to missing or improper authorization checks in version 1.0.2 and below.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Templazee theme versionLocate the style.css file in the Templazee theme directory (typically /wp-content/themes/templazee/) and read the Version header, or check via WordPress admin dashboard under Appearance > ThemesAffected if The installed version is 1.0.2 or lower
-
Verify theme is activeConfirm the Templazee theme is currently activated in WordPress at Dashboard > Appearance > ThemesAffected if Templazee theme is the active theme
-
Inspect authorization logicExamine theme files (particularly functions.php and any admin-related files) for authorization check functions (current_user_can, check_admin_referer, capability checks) around sensitive functionsAffected if No capability checks are found before sensitive operations, or authorization is missing on admin AJAX actions or frontend submission handlers
-
Test access control configurationAttempt to access theme-specific admin pages or settings endpoints while logged in as a low-privilege user (subscriber) to verify if authorization is enforcedAffected if A low-privilege user can access functions or data that should require administrator privileges
A user is affected if the Templazee theme version is 1.0.2 or below AND the theme lacks proper authorization checks on sensitive functions or endpoints.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks across all sensitive endpoints and functions, enforce role-based access control (RBAC) appropriately, and ensure all user actions verify the current user's permissions before execution.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49949 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49949 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data