CVE-2025-4999
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Linksys FGW3000-AH and FGW3000-HK up to 1.0.17.000000 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is the function sub_4153FC of the file /cgi-bin/sysconf.cgi of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument supplicant_rnd_id_en leads to command injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in Linksys FGW3000-AH and FGW3000-HK routers (up to firmware 1.0.17.000000). The supplicant_rnd_id_en parameter in /cgi-bin/sysconf.cgi is not sanitized before being passed to a system call, allowing remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands. Public exploit availability and CVSS 9.8 indicate critical risk with trivial exploitability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0.17.000000<= 1.0.17.000000CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify device modelAccess the router admin interface or check the device label to confirm the model is Linksys FGW3000-AH or FGW3000-HKAffected if Model is FGW3000-AH or FGW3000-HK
-
Check firmware versionNavigate to the router web interface (typically Status or System Info page) or use the command line to retrieve the firmware version. Common paths: admin panel firmware upgrade page or via SNMP/Telnet if availableAffected if Firmware version is 1.0.17.000000 or lower
-
Confirm remote web management is accessibleAttempt to access the router web interface from an external network IP address (the CGI endpoint /cgi-bin/sysconf.cgi). Check if port 80 or 443 is open to external IPsAffected if The management web interface (port 80/443) is reachable from untrusted networks
-
Verify the vulnerable CGI endpoint existsSend a request to http://<router-ip>/cgi-bin/sysconf.cgi and observe if the endpoint responds. The vulnerability exists in the supplicant_rnd_id_en parameterAffected if The /cgi-bin/sysconf.cgi endpoint is accessible and processes the supplicant_rnd_id_en parameter without sanitization
The device is affected if it is a Linksys FGW3000-AH or FGW3000-HK router running firmware version 1.0.17.000000 or lower, and the web management interface is accessible to the attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedSince no vendor patch is available, restrict network exposure by disabling remote web management, placing the device behind a firewall, or replacing the affected hardware. If the device must remain in production, implement strict network access controls to prevent unauthorized access to the management interface.
Any Linksys FGW3000-AH or FGW3000-HK firmware version newer than 1.0.17.000000 (e.g., 1.0.18.x or later)
- 1. Identify the exact model number (FGW3000-AH or FGW3000-HK) of the affected Linksys device
- 2. Access the device administration interface and navigate to the firmware/version information section to confirm the current firmware version
- 3. Visit the official Linksys support website at www.linksys.com and locate the firmware download section for the FGW3000 series
- 4. Download the latest available firmware version for your specific model (note: versions newer than 1.0.17.000000 should contain the fix)
- 5. Upload and apply the new firmware through the device's web interface or administrative console
- 6. After reboot, verify the new firmware version is installed and confirm the vulnerability is remediated
- 7. If no newer firmware is available from Linksys, contact Linksys technical support directly to request the security update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4999 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4999 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data