Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-49997

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Syed Balkhi Giveaways and Contests by RafflePress rafflepress allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Giveaways and Contests by RafflePress: from n/a through <= 1.12.18.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a broken access control vulnerability in the WordPress plugin 'Giveaways and Contests by RafflePress' (rafflepress). The plugin fails to properly enforce authorization checks on certain functionality, allowing users to access privileged operations that should be restricted by Access Control Lists (ACLs). An attacker could potentially manipulate giveaways, contests, or access sensitive data without proper authorization.

MitigationUpdate the RafflePress plugin to the latest version which should include proper capability checks, nonce verification, and role-based access control enforcement on all sensitive endpoints. If no update is available, disable the plugin until a patch is released.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify RafflePress plugin is installed
    Log in to WordPress admin dashboard and navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'Giveaways and Contests by RafflePress' or 'RafflePress' in the list of active plugins.
    Affected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list, regardless of activation status, indicating the vulnerable code is present.
  2. Identify installed RafflePress version
    In the Plugins page, find the RafflePress entry and note the version number displayed beneath the plugin name. Alternatively, check the plugin main file header at wp-content/plugins/rafflepress/rafflepress.php for the 'Version' comment.
    Affected if The installed version matches or falls within the affected version range (compare to vendor advisories for specific vulnerable versions).
  3. Confirm plugin is active on frontend
    Visit the website homepage and view page source, or use a site scanner, to detect if RafflePress JavaScript assets (rafflepress-loader.js or similar) are loading on public-facing pages.
    Affected if The plugin is active and loaded on the site, meaning the access control vulnerability can potentially be exploited via web requests.
  4. Check user role configuration
    Navigate to RafflePress > Settings > General in the admin panel. Review which user roles have access to create, edit, or manage giveaways and contests.
    Affected if Lower-privileged roles (such as Contributor, Author, or Editor) have permission to create or manage giveaways, indicating overly permissive ACL settings.

Your environment is affected if the RafflePress plugin is installed with a vulnerable version AND the plugin exposes privileged functionality to users without proper capability checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the RafflePress plugin to the latest version which should include proper capability checks, nonce verification, and role-based access control enforcement on all sensitive endpoints. If no update is available, disable the plugin until a patch is released.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,780
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,848.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-49997 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-49997 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data