CVE-2025-50008
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in cscode WooCommerce Manager – Customize and Control Cart page, Add to Cart button, Checkout fields easily innovs-woo-manager allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects WooCommerce Manager – Customize and Control Cart page, Add to Cart button, Checkout fields easily: from n/a through <= 1.2.4.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in the WooCommerce Manager plugin allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. The plugin fails to properly enforce authorization checks on certain functionality, potentially allowing unauthenticated or lower-privileged users to access administrative features or perform actions beyond their intended permissions. This is a broken access control (BAC) issue affecting versions up to 1.2.4.5.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify WooCommerce Manager plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and locate WooCommerce Manager to confirm the installed version number, or check the plugin header in /wp-content/plugins/woocommerce-manager/ directory for the Version fieldAffected if The installed version is 1.2.4.5 or any earlier version
-
Confirm plugin is activeCheck that the WooCommerce Manager plugin is currently activated in the WordPress plugins listAffected if The plugin is active and running version 1.2.4.5 or below
-
Identify accessible admin endpointsReview WordPress debug logs or server access logs for requests to /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php or wp-json/wp/v2/ endpoints that may be routed through WooCommerce Manager functionality without capability verificationAffected if Non-administrator users or unauthenticated requests can reach admin actions intended only for administrators
-
Inspect user role capability assignmentsUse a role editor plugin or WP-CLI role command to list capabilities assigned to lower-privileged roles (editor, author, contributor, subscriber) and check if any WooCommerce Manager administrative capabilities are incorrectly assignedAffected if Subscriber, contributor, author, or editor roles possess manage_woocommerce, manage_options, or similar admin-level capabilities they should not have
A user is affected if the WooCommerce Manager plugin version is 1.2.4.5 or lower and the plugin is active, particularly if lower-privileged accounts have elevated capabilities or admin interfaces are accessible without proper authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper capability checks and authorization verification on all sensitive plugin functions and admin actions to ensure users have appropriate permissions before granting access.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-50008 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-50008 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data