Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-50036

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-20
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Yamna Khawaja Mailing Group Listserv wp-mailing-group allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Mailing Group Listserv: from n/a through <= 3.0.5.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the wp-mailing-group WordPress plugin (Mailing Group Listserv version <= 3.0.5) allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended state-changing actions by forcing their browser to send malicious requests. The plugin lacks proper anti-CSRF token validation on sensitive operations.

MitigationUpdate the wp-mailing-group plugin to the latest version (3.0.6+) which should include proper CSRF token (nonce) validation for all state-changing requests. Alternatively, implement anti-CSRF tokens on all forms and AJAX actions within the plugin.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm wp-mailing-group plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and look for 'wp-mailing-group' or 'Mailing Group Listserv' in the list of installed plugins
    Affected if Plugin is installed and active
  2. Identify installed plugin version
    Click 'View Details' on the wp-mailing-group plugin in the WordPress plugins list, or check the plugin's main PHP file for the 'Version' header in the plugin comment block
    Affected if Version displayed is 3.0.5 or lower
  3. Verify plugin is in use for state-changing operations
    Check if the mailing group functionality is actively used (e.g., users can subscribe, unsubscribe, send emails through the plugin). Inspect the plugin settings page for forms that perform actions like adding/removing members or sending messages
    Affected if Plugin has active forms or AJAX endpoints for subscriber management or message sending
  4. Inspect code for missing CSRF token validation
    Examine the plugin's PHP files (particularly form handlers and AJAX callbacks) for presence of nonce verification calls such as check_admin_referer(), check_ajax_referer(), or wp_verify_nonce(). Look for these before any state-changing operations like updating options, modifying subscribers, or sending emails
    Affected if State-changing code lacks nonce verification or uses it incorrectly (e.g., nonce present but not validated before processing)
  5. Check forms for nonce field presence
    View page source of plugin-generated forms (subscription forms, admin settings forms). Look for hidden input fields named '_wpnonce' or similar nonce fields. Compare with WordPress best practices for form nonce implementation
    Affected if Forms lack hidden nonce fields or token parameters

User is affected if the wp-mailing-group plugin is installed at version 3.0.5 or lower and contains forms or AJAX actions that handle subscriber data or messages without proper CSRF token validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update the wp-mailing-group plugin to the latest version (3.0.6+) which should include proper CSRF token (nonce) validation for all state-changing requests. Alternatively, implement anti-CSRF tokens on all forms and AJAX actions within the plugin.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-50036 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-50036 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data