CVE-2025-50044
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Rameez Iqbal Real Estate Manager real-estate-manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Real Estate Manager: from n/a through <= 7.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Real Estate Manager plugin allows attackers to induce authenticated users to perform unintended state-changing actions. The vulnerability exists in versions up to and including 7.3, likely due to missing or inadequate anti-CSRF tokens on form submissions and state-changing operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed version of the Real Estate Manager pluginAccess your WordPress plugin administration panel or inspect the plugin header in the main plugin file to determine the current version numberAffected if The installed version is 7.3 or lower (the vulnerability affects versions up to and including 7.3)
-
Inspect form handling code for missing CSRF token validationExamine the plugin source code, specifically files handling form submissions, to verify that nonce or CSRF tokens are generated and validated before processing any form dataAffected if Forms and state-changing operations lack nonce/token verification or use inadequate token validation
-
Verify state-changing operations validate tokensReview PHP files handling POST/PUT/DELETE requests to confirm that tokens are validated server-side before executing any state-changing actionsAffected if State-changing operations do not validate anti-CSRF tokens or validate them inconsistently
-
Check for Referer or Origin header validationInspect the server-side code to determine if HTTP Referer or Origin headers are validated to verify the request originAffected if Referer/Origin headers are not validated or are validated inconsistently
You are affected if your Real Estate Manager plugin version is 7.3 or lower AND your implementation lacks proper anti-CSRF token validation on forms and state-changing operations.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all forms and state-changing requests, and validate the Referer/Origin headers server-side. Ensure tokens are validated before processing any POST/PUT/DELETE requests.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-50044 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-50044 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data