CVE-2025-50110
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in the method push.lite.avtech.com.AvtechLib.GetHttpsResponse in AVTECH EagleEyes Lite 2.0.0, the GetHttpsResponse method transmits sensitive information - including internal server URLs, account IDs, passwords, and device tokens - as plaintext query parameters over HTTPS
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe GetHttpsResponse method in AVTECH EagleEyes Lite 2.0.0 transmits sensitive information including internal server URLs, account IDs, passwords, and device tokens as plaintext query parameters over HTTPS. While the connection is encrypted, the sensitive data is exposed in URL query strings which are logged by servers, proxies, and browser/history, making this a sensitive data exposure vulnerability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify AVTECH EagleEyes Lite installationCheck the installed software or application for AVTECH EagleEyes Lite version 2.0.0. This may be visible in the application about screen, installed programs list, or firmware version if embedded.Affected if The product is AVTECH EagleEyes Lite version 2.0.0 or if the version cannot be definitively determined as a later patched version.
-
Inspect network traffic for GetHttpsResponse callsUse a network proxy, browser developer tools, or packet capture to observe HTTPS requests made by the application. Look for the GetHttpsResponse method calls containing sensitive data in the URL query string.Affected if Requests include internal server URLs, account IDs, passwords, or device tokens as query parameters (e.g., ?password=xxx&token=xxx).
-
Examine server and proxy access logsReview web server, proxy server, and application logs for logged requests. Search for entries containing sensitive strings like passwords, tokens, or account IDs in the URL portion of the log entries.Affected if Logs contain sensitive credentials or tokens in the request URL query string, indicating the data was exposed in transit.
-
Review browser history and cached URLsCheck browser history, cached data, or application logs for any recorded URLs containing sensitive query parameters. This applies if the application has a web interface or browser component.Affected if Browser or application history shows URLs with sensitive query parameters like passwords, account IDs, or device tokens visible in plain text.
A defender is affected if AVTECH EagleEyes Lite 2.0.0 is in use and sensitive credentials, account IDs, device tokens, or internal URLs are transmitted as URL query parameters rather than in POST body or headers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRefactor the GetHttpsResponse method and its call sites to transmit sensitive credentials, tokens, and identifiers via POST request body or HTTP headers instead of URL query parameters to prevent exposure in logs.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-50110 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-50110 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data