CVE-2025-50177
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse after free in Windows Message Queuing allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in Windows Message Queuing (MSMQ) that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code by sending specially crafted network packets to a target system with MSMQ enabled.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21100< 10.0.14393.8330< 10.0.17763.7678< 10.0.19044.6216< 10.0.19045.6216< 10.0.22621.5768< 10.0.22631.5768< 10.0.26100.4851CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if MSMQ service is installedOpen Services console (services.msc) and look for 'Message Queuing' service, or run 'Get-Service -Name MSMQ' in PowerShellAffected if MSMQ service exists on the system - this is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable
-
Check if MSMQ service is runningRun 'Get-Service -Name MSMQ | Select-Object Status' in PowerShell or check the Status column in Services consoleAffected if MSMQ service is running - the vulnerability is only exploitable when the service is active
-
Identify Windows versionRun 'winver' command or 'Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object OsVersion, OsBuildNumber' in PowerShellAffected if Windows version and build number fall within any of these ranges: Windows 10 1507 < 10.0.10240.21100, Windows 10 1607 < 10.0.14393.8330, Windows 10 1809 < 10.0.17763.7678, Windows 10 21h2 < 10.0.19044.6216, Windows 10 22h2 < 10.0.19045.6216, Windows 11 22h2 < 10.0.22621.5768, Windows 11 23h2 < 10.0.
-
Confirm MSMQ network listener statusRun 'netstat -an | findstr "1801"' in Command Prompt or use PowerShell 'Get-NetTCPConnection -LocalPort 1801 -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue' to check if MSMQ ports are listeningAffected if MSMQ is listening on network ports (default port 1801) - this indicates the service is exposed to network traffic and could be remotely exploited
The system is affected if it runs a vulnerable Windows version (within the specified version ranges) AND has MSMQ service installed and running with network exposure.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2110010.0.14393.833010.0.17763.7678
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2025-50177 to all affected Windows systems, and consider disabling Windows Message Queuing if not required in the environment.
Windows 10 1507: build 10.0.10240.21100 or later | Windows 10 1607: build 10.0.14393.8330 or later | Windows 10 1809: build 10.0.17763.7678 or later | Windows 10 21h2: build 10.0.19044.6216 or later | Windows 10 22h2: build 10.0.19045.6216 or later | Windows 11 22h2: build 10.0.22621.5768 or later |
- Open Windows Settings by pressing Win+I
- Navigate to Update & Security > Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest security updates
- Restart the computer if prompted to complete the installation
- Verify the installed build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows edition (Windows 10 1507: 10.0.10240.21100, Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.8330, Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.7678, Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.6216, Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.6216, Windows 11 22h2: 10.0.22621.5768, Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.5768, Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.4851)
- To check the build number: press Win+R, type 'winver', and press Enter
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-50177 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-50177 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data