CVE-2025-50228
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJizhicms v2.5.4 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in User Evaluation, Message, and Comment modules.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceJizhicms v2.5.4 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the User Evaluation, Message, and Comment modules. This allows attackers to induce the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal resources or external systems, potentially accessing internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, or bypassing network segmentation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.5.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Jizhicms versionLocate the version file or version constant in the Jizhicms installation (commonly in /admin or /app directory, or in a version.php/config.php file). Check the version number reported.Affected if The installed version is exactly 2.5.4
-
Locate User Evaluation module filesSearch the application source code for directories or files related to user evaluation functionality (look for terms like 'evaluation', 'user_eval', or similar naming patterns in the /app/module or /plugins directories).Affected if The User Evaluation module exists and is accessible in the installation
-
Locate Message module filesSearch the application source code for directories or files related to messaging functionality (look for 'message', 'msg', or 'messageboard' in the /app/module or /plugins directories).Affected if The Message module exists and is accessible in the installation
-
Locate Comment module filesSearch the application source code for directories or files related to comment functionality (look for 'comment' in the /app/module or /plugins directories).Affected if The Comment module exists and is accessible in the installation
You are affected if the installed Jizhicms version is exactly 2.5.4 AND any of the User Evaluation, Message, or Comment modules are present and enabled in the application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict URL/hostname allow-listing and input validation for all user-supplied URLs in the affected modules. Disable unnecessary URL fetching capabilities and restrict outbound connections from the application server.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-50228 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-50228 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data