CVE-2025-50862
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Lotus Cars Android app (com.lotus.carsdomestic.intl) 1.2.8 has allowBackup=true set in its manifest, allowing data exfiltration via ADB backup on rooted or debug-enabled devices. This presents a risk of user data exposure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Lotus Cars Android app version 1.2.8 has android:allowBackup="true" set in its AndroidManifest.xml, which permits full application data backup via Android Debug Bridge (ADB) backup commands. On rooted devices or devices with USB debugging enabled, attackers can extract sensitive user data from the app's private storage directories.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Lotus Cars app versionRun 'adb shell pm list packages | grep lotus' to find the package name, then 'adb shell pm dump <package_name> | grep versionName' to get the versionAffected if Version is 1.2.8
-
Check allowBackup setting in AndroidManifest.xmlDecompile the APK (using apktool) and inspect AndroidManifest.xml for android:allowBackup="true" attributeAffected if android:allowBackup is set to true (or the attribute is missing, which defaults to true in older Android versions)
-
Verify USB debugging status on deviceOn the device, go to Settings > Developer Options > USB debugging, or run 'adb get-state' to check if ADB debugging is enabledAffected if USB debugging is enabled on the device
-
Check for root access or rooting statusRun 'adb shell su -c id' or use a root checker app to determine if the device has root privilegesAffected if Device has root access or is a rooted device
The environment is affected if the Lotus Cars Android app version 1.2.8 is installed with allowBackup="true" in the manifest AND the device has USB debugging enabled or root access, allowing unauthorized backup extraction of app data.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedSet android:allowBackup="false" in the AndroidManifest.xml file, rebuild the application, and release an updated version to users.
- Open the AndroidManifest.xml file in the project source code
- Locate the <application> tag element
- Add or modify the android:allowBackup attribute to set it to false: android:allowBackup="false"
- Rebuild and redistribute the app with this configuration change
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-50862 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-50862 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data