CVE-2025-5087
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedKaleris NAVIS N4 ULC (Ultra Light Client) communicates insecurely using zlib-compressed data over HTTP. An attacker capable of observing network traffic between Ultra Light Clients and N4 servers can extract sensitive information, including plaintext credentials.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Kaleris NAVIS N4 Ultra Light Client transmits zlib-compressed data over unencrypted HTTP, allowing network eavesdroppers to intercept and decompress traffic containing sensitive information such as plaintext credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NAVIS N4 Ultra Light Client installationLocate the client application or configuration files associated with Kaleris NAVIS N4 Ultra Light Client in your environmentAffected if The NAVIS N4 Ultra Light Client software is present and active in the environment
-
Determine the protocol used for client-server communicationExamine the connection settings, configuration files, or network traffic to identify whether HTTP or HTTPS is being used for communication between Ultra Light Clients and the N4 serverAffected if HTTP (unencrypted) is used instead of HTTPS for client-server communication
-
Verify if TLS encryption is enabledCheck the server and client configuration settings for TLS/SSL enablement status, or inspect the protocol used in the connection URL or handshakeAffected if TLS encryption is disabled or not configured for Ultra Light Client communications
-
Inspect network traffic for zlib-compressed data over HTTPUse a network sniffer or packet capture tool to observe outgoing traffic from the Ultra Light Client, looking for zlib-compressed data transmitted over unencrypted HTTP connectionsAffected if zlib-compressed data is observed traveling over unencrypted HTTP channels
The environment is affected if the NAVIS N4 Ultra Light Client is transmitting zlib-compressed data over unencrypted HTTP rather than TLS-protected HTTPS connections
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataEnable TLS encryption (HTTPS) for all communication between Ultra Light Clients and N4 servers to protect data in transit.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-5087 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-5087 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data