Gitkraken DesktopApplication · Axosoft

CVE-2025-51387

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The GitKraken Desktop 10.8.0 and 11.1.0 is susceptible to code injection due to misconfigured Electron Fuses. Specifically, the following insecure settings were observed: RunAsNode is enabled and EnableNodeCliInspectArguments is not disabled. These configurations allow the application to be executed in Node.js mode, enabling attackers to pass arguments that result in arbitrary code execution.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

GitKraken Desktop 10.8.0 and 11.1.0 contains insecure Electron Fuses configuration where RunAsNode is enabled and EnableNodeCliInspectArguments is not disabled. These settings allow the application to be spawned in Node.js mode, enabling attackers to inject arbitrary code execution arguments via the command line.

MitigationDisable RunAsNode and EnableNodeCliInspectArguments in Electron Fuses configuration at build time, then rebuild and redistribute the application.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Gitkraken DesktopApplication
Affected:= 10.8.0= 11.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm GitKraken Desktop installation
    Locate the GitKraken executable in your system - common paths include C:\Program Files\GitKraken\gitkraken.exe on Windows or /Applications/GitKraken.app on macOS. Use 'where gitkraken' on Windows or 'mdfind "kMDItemCFBundleIdentifier == \"com.axosoft.gitkraken\""' on macOS.
    Affected if GitKraken Desktop is installed on the system.
  2. Identify installed version
    Run 'gitkraken --version' from command line, or right-click the executable, select Properties, and check the File version/Product version details. On macOS, use 'defaults read /Applications/GitKraken.app/Contents/Info.plist CFBundleVersion'.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 10.8.0 or 11.1.0.
  3. Verify Electron fuses configuration (advanced)
    Extract the application asar archive from resources folder and inspect the Electron binary using 'fuses-v1 extractor' or similar tool that can read Electron fuse states from the compiled binary. Check for RunAsNode fuse being ON and EnableNodeCliInspectArguments fuse not being disabled.
    Affected if The Electron fuses show RunAsNode is enabled and EnableNodeCliInspectArguments is not disabled.

If GitKraken Desktop version 10.8.0 or 11.1.0 is installed, the environment is affected by this insecure Electron Fuses configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Disable RunAsNode and EnableNodeCliInspectArguments in Electron Fuses configuration at build time, then rebuild and redistribute the application.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Latest GitKraken Desktop version (beyond 11.1.0)

  1. Upgrade GitKraken Desktop to the latest available version beyond 11.1.0
  2. Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking Help > About GitKraken
Caveat Review release notes for any new features or changes that may affect workflow

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Gitkraken Desktop Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $890
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-51387 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-51387 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data