CVE-2025-52021
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the edit_product.php file of PuneethReddyHC Online Shopping System Advanced 1.0. The product_id GET parameter is unsafely passed to a SQL query without proper validation or parameterization.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA SQL Injection vulnerability exists in the edit_product.php file of the PuneethReddyHC Online Shopping System Advanced 1.0. The product_id GET parameter is directly concatenated into a SQL query without any input validation or use of prepared statements, allowing an attacker to manipulate the query structure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the application installationSearch for files or directories containing 'Online Shopping' or 'PuneethReddyHC' in the web server document rootAffected if The application is present on the server
-
Find edit_product.phpLocate the edit_product.php file within the application directory structureAffected if The file exists in the application
-
Inspect SQL query handlingOpen edit_product.php and examine how the product_id GET parameter is used in SQL queries - look for direct concatenation without prepared statements or escaping functionsAffected if The code shows direct concatenation of $_GET['product_id'] into SQL queries without parameterization
-
Verify parameter handlingCheck if input validation or type casting (such as intval or is_numeric) is applied to product_id before SQL useAffected if No input validation or type casting is performed on product_id before SQL execution
-
Confirm network accessibilityDetermine if the application is accessible over HTTP/HTTPS to external usersAffected if The vulnerable endpoint is reachable from the network
You are affected if the Online Shopping System Advanced is installed, edit_product.php contains direct SQL concatenation using the product_id parameter without prepared statements or input validation, and the endpoint is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace the unsafe SQL query construction with parameterized queries (prepared statements) using PDO or mysqli, and implement proper input validation for the product_id parameter before using it in database queries.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52021 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52021 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data