CVE-2025-52023
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the PHP backend of gemscms.aptsys.com.sg thru 2025-05-28 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trigger detailed error messages that disclose internal file paths, code snippets, and stack traces. This occurs when specially crafted HTTP GET/POST requests are sent to public API endpoints, exposing potentially sensitive information useful for further exploitation. This issue is classified under CWE-209: Information Exposure Through an Error Message.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability where the PHP backend exposes detailed error messages containing internal file paths, code snippets, and stack traces when malformed HTTP GET/POST requests are sent to public API endpoints. Attackers can use this information to understand the application's internal structure and identify additional vulnerabilities for exploitation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2025-05-28CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Gemscms versionLocate the version file or admin panel in the Aptsys Gemscms installation and record the version number or build date.Affected if The version or build date is 2025-05-28 or earlier.
-
Locate API endpoint URLsReview the application documentation or enumerate the codebase for publicly accessible API endpoint paths (typically under /api/ or similar routes).Affected if Public API endpoints exist and are reachable over HTTP.
-
Send malformed GET request to APISend a malformed HTTP GET request to a discovered API endpoint (e.g., missing required parameters, invalid syntax) and capture the HTTP response.Affected if The response contains full file paths, PHP code snippets, or detailed stack traces.
-
Send malformed POST request to APISend a malformed HTTP POST request with invalid or tampered parameters to an API endpoint and capture the response.Affected if The response reveals internal paths, source code excerpts, or exception stack traces.
-
Check PHP error display configurationInspect the PHP configuration file (php.ini) or check the runtime configuration for display_errors and html_errors settings.Affected if display_errors is set to On or html_errors is enabled on a production system.
A system is affected if it runs Aptsys Gemscms Backend version dated 2025-05-28 or earlier and its API endpoints return detailed error information including file paths, code snippets, or stack traces in response to malformed requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement custom error handlers that display generic user-friendly messages to clients while logging detailed error information server-side for debugging. Ensure all API endpoints properly catch exceptions and return sanitized responses.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52023 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52023 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data