CVE-2025-52389
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in Envasadora H2O Eireli - Soda Cristal v40.20.4 allows authenticated attackers to access sensitive data for other users via a crafted HTTP request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the Soda Cristal v40.20.4 web application. The application exposes direct references to objects (likely database record IDs or resource identifiers) without properly validating that the authenticated user has authorization to access those specific objects. An attacker with valid credentials can manipulate object references in HTTP requests to read sensitive data belonging to other users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Soda Cristal web application is runningLocate running web processes or services for Soda Cristal - check running services, containers, or web server configurations that host this applicationAffected if Soda Cristal v40.20.4 is actively running as a web service
-
Determine the installed version of Soda CristalCheck the application's version information - this may be displayed in the web UI footer, in configuration files, or accessible via an API endpoint that returns version metadataAffected if The installed version matches v40.20.4 exactly
-
Identify endpoints that expose direct object referencesReview application URLs and API routes for patterns where record IDs, resource identifiers, or database keys appear directly in request parameters (e.g., /user/123, /record?id=456)Affected if The application uses direct object references in URL parameters or paths without indirect mapping
-
Check if authorization validation exists on object-access endpointsExamine the application's access control logic - review authentication middleware, session handling, and authorization checks that verify the authenticated user owns or can access the requested objectAffected if Object reference endpoints lack ownership verification for the currently authenticated user
-
Test for IDOR by manipulating object referencesUsing valid credentials, access an object you own, then modify the object ID in the request to reference another user's object and observe whether access is granted without authorization errorAffected if Manipulating object IDs in requests returns data belonging to other users
If running Soda Cristal v40.20.4 and the application exposes direct object references without verifying user ownership, the environment is vulnerable to this IDOR flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks on all endpoints that expose object references, ensuring the currently authenticated user has rights to access the requested resource. Consider using indirect object references and validating user ownership before returning any data.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52389 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52389 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data