CVE-2025-52429
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability has been reported to affect several QNAP operating system versions. If a remote attacker gains an administrator account, they can then exploit the vulnerability to obtain secret data or modify memory. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 and later QuTS hero h5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 and later
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a format string vulnerability (CWE-134) in QNAP QTS and QuTS hero operating systems where external user input is used as a format string without proper sanitization. An attacker who first obtains administrator credentials can exploit this to read sensitive data from memory or modify memory contents, potentially leading to code execution or information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.2.0.2737= 5.2.0.2744= 5.2.0.2782= 5.2.0.2802= 5.2.0.2823= 5.2.0.2851= 5.2.0.2860= 5.2.1.2930= 5.2.2.2950= 5.2.3.3006= 5.2.4.3070= 5.2.4.3079= h5.2.0.2737= h5.2.0.2782= h5.2.0.2789= h5.2.0.2802= h5.2.0.2823= h5.2.0.2851= h5.2.0.2860= h5.2.1.2929= h5.2.1.2940= h5.2.2.2952= h5.2.3.3006= h5.2.4.3070CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the QNAP firmware versionLog into the QNAP admin web interface, go to Control Panel > System > Firmware, or run `getcfg System.Version` via SSH on the NASAffected if The displayed version matches any of these: QTS 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, 5.2.0.2802, 5.2.0.2823, 5.2.0.2851, 5.2.0.2860, 5.2.1.2930, 5.2.2.2950, 5.2.3.3006, 5.2.4.3070, 5.2.4.3079 OR QuTS hero h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, h5.2.0.2802, h5.2.0.2823, h5.2.0.2851, h5.2.0.2860, h5.2.
-
Confirm the operating system typeIn the QNAP admin interface, check whether the device runs QTS or QuTS hero (this is visible on the dashboard or in System > Information)Affected if The device runs either QTS or QuTS hero and the version from step 1 is in the affected list for that OS type
-
Verify if administrator access is possibleReview user accounts with administrator privileges in Control Panel > Privilege > Users, or check if default admin account remains enabledAffected if Any administrator account exists on the system (the vulnerability requires an attacker to first obtain administrator credentials)
The system is affected if it runs QTS or QuTS hero with any version listed as affected AND has at least one administrator account configured.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied firmware updates (QTS 5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 or QuTS hero h5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 and later). Prior to patching, ensure administrator accounts use strong, unique passwords and consider network segmentation to limit exposure.
QTS 5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 or later / QuTS hero h5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 or later
- 1. Identify the current QTS or QuTS hero version by accessing the QNAP admin interface and navigating to Control Panel > System > Firmware Update
- 2. Compare the current version against the affected builds: QTS 5.2.0.2737, 5.2.0.2744, 5.2.0.2782, 5.2.0.2802 or QuTS hero h5.2.0.2737, h5.2.0.2782, h5.2.0.2789, h5.2.0.2802
- 3. If running an affected version, initiate a firmware update through the QNAP admin interface or manually download the update from QNAP's support page
- 4. Upgrade to QTS 5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 or later (for QTS systems) or QuTS hero h5.2.6.3195 build 20250715 or later (for QuTS hero systems)
- 5. After upgrade, verify the new firmware version is installed correctly and the system is operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52429 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52429 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data