CVE-2025-52436
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability [CWE-79] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.1, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.7, FortiSandbox 4.2 all versions, FortiSandbox 4.0 all versions may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute commands via crafted requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceFortiSandbox contains a stored XSS vulnerability (CWE-79) in versions 5.0.0-5.0.1, 4.4.0-4.4.7, 4.2, and 4.0 that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts via crafted requests. The CVSS 9.6 score indicates the vulnerability is easily exploitable and has high impact, likely due to the 'command execution' capability mentioned in the description.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.0.0, < 4.4.8>= 5.0.0, < 5.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiSandbox installed versionLog into the FortiSandbox web UI and navigate to System > Dashboard > Status, or run the CLI command: get system statusAffected if The displayed version falls within 4.0.0 to 4.4.7, or 5.0.0 to 5.0.1 (meaning version is less than 4.4.8 or less than 5.0.2)
-
Verify the exact version numberLocate the Firmware Version field in the status page or CLI outputAffected if Version starts with 4.0.x, 4.2.x, 4.4.x (versions below 4.4.8), or 5.0.0 to 5.0.1 (versions below 5.0.2)
-
Confirm web management interface is accessibleCheck if FortiSandbox HTTPS admin port (typically 443) is reachable from network segments accessible to untrusted usersAffected if The management interface is exposed to unauthenticated or untrusted network traffic, as the flaw allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts
-
Review web interface for unexpected scriptsIf accessible, inspect any user-controllable fields in the web UI (such as job comments, report names, or configuration labels) for unexpected script tagsAffected if Malicious script tags appear in fields that were not intentionally entered by an administrator, indicating potential exploitation
You are affected if your FortiSandbox version is 4.0.0 through 4.4.7 or 5.0.0 through 5.0.1 AND the management interface is network-accessible to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.4.85.0.2
Apply the vendor-supplied patch or upgrade FortiSandbox to a version beyond the affected ranges. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the FortiSandbox management interface.
FortiSandbox 4.4.8 (for 4.x branch) or FortiSandbox 5.0.2 (for 5.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current FortiSandbox version by accessing the admin GUI or running 'get system status' in CLI
- 2. Determine which branch (4.x or 5.x) is currently deployed to select the appropriate upgrade path
- 3. Review FortiSandbox release notes for the target version (4.4.8 or 5.0.2) to understand new features and any migration requirements
- 4. Create a complete backup of the FortiSandbox configuration via GUI (System > Maintenance > Backup) or CLI 'execute backup full-config'
- 5. If running FortiSandbox 4.0.x-4.4.x, upgrade to version 4.4.8. If running FortiSandbox 5.0.x, upgrade to version 5.0.2
- 6. Upload the firmware file via GUI (System > Firmware) or CLI and reboot the system
- 7. After upgrade completes, verify the version running is the fixed release (4.4.8 or 5.0.2)
- 8. Confirm the vulnerability is remediated by checking the FortiGuard advisory at fortiguard.fortinet.com
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52436 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52436 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data