Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)Weakness · CWE-918

CVE-2025-52491

MEDIUM · 5.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Akamai CloudTest before 60 2025.06.09 (12989) allows SSRF.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Akamai CloudTest versions prior to 60 2025.06.09 (12989) contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that allows attackers to induce the application to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains. This can enable access to internal services, metadata endpoints, or internal network resources that should not be exposed.

MitigationUpgrade Akamai CloudTest to version 60 2025.06.09 (12989) or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict outbound network access from CloudTest servers using firewall rules and network segmentation to limit potential SSRF targets.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify CloudTest installation
    Locate the Akamai CloudTest installation and determine its version number. This is typically found in the product UI under About/Version info, or in installation/manifest files if you have server access.
    Affected if Version is prior to 60 2025.06.09 (12989)
  2. Compare installed version to affected range
    Take the identified version and compare it against the affected range: any version before 60 2025.06.09 (12989) is vulnerable. If your version starts with 60 and was released after June 9, 2025 with build 12989 or higher, it is not affected.
    Affected if Installed version number is lower than 60 2025.06.09 (12989)
  3. Assess network exposure
    Determine if the CloudTest interface is accessible from untrusted networks. Check firewall rules, VPN configuration, and whether the management interface is exposed to the internet or only to trusted internal networks.
    Affected if CloudTest is reachable by attackers who can trigger the SSRF vulnerability

You are affected if your Akamai CloudTest version is earlier than 60 2025.06.09 (12989) and the application is network-accessible to potential attackers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Akamai CloudTest to version 60 2025.06.09 (12989) or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict outbound network access from CloudTest servers using firewall rules and network segmentation to limit potential SSRF targets.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

60 2025.06.09 (12989) or later

  1. 1. Identify the current version of Akamai CloudTest installed in your environment
  2. 2. Obtain the fixed version 60 2025.06.09 (12989) or later from Akamai's official distribution channels
  3. 3. Plan and schedule the upgrade following Akamai's standard CloudTest update procedures
  4. 4. Perform the upgrade to version 60 2025.06.09 (12989) or later
  5. 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the new version number
  6. 6. Validate that the SSRF vulnerability has been remediated through appropriate testing

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,864.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52491 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52491 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data