CVE-2025-52515
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in the Camera in Samsung Mobile Processor and Wearable Processor Exynos 1330, 1380, 1480, 2400, 1580, 2500. A race condition in the issimian device driver results in an out-of-bounds access, leading to a denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition in the issimian camera device driver for Samsung Exynos processors (1330, 1380, 1480, 2400, 1580, 2500) allows an attacker to trigger an out-of-bounds memory access, causing a denial of service. The vulnerability exists in kernel-mode driver code and stems from improper synchronization when accessing shared data structures.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Exynos processor modelCheck the system-on-chip (SoC) or processor information of the Samsung device using system information utilities or /proc/cpuinfoAffected if The processor is one of: Exynos 1330, 1380, 1480, 1580, 2400, or 2500
-
Verify the issimian camera driver presenceCheck if the issimian camera driver module is loaded or present in the kernel module listAffected if The issimian camera driver is loaded or installed on the system
-
Check for camera subsystem crashesReview kernel logs, system logs, or crash dumps for errors related to the camera subsystem or issimian driverAffected if Recent crashes or errors mentioning the issimian driver or camera device are found
-
Monitor for out-of-bounds memory access eventsInspect kernel debug logs or security event logs for memory access violations originating from the camera driverAffected if Out-of-bounds memory access errors tied to the camera driver are logged
-
Confirm camera driver is in useVerify that the camera application or any process is actively using the camera subsystemAffected if Camera functionality is enabled and the issimian driver is actively handling camera operations
A device is affected if it uses a Samsung Exynos 1330, 1380, 1480, 1580, 2400, or 2500 processor and has the issimian camera driver loaded, regardless of firmware version since all versions are vulnerable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware/security updates for affected Exynos processors when released. Until then, limit device exposure to untrusted applications and monitor for camera subsystem crashes.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52515 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52515 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data