CVE-2025-52540
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper input validation vulnerability within the AMD Platform Management Framework (PMF) Driver can allow a local attacker to write Out-of-Bounds, potentially resulting in privilege escalation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA local privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the AMD Platform Management Framework (PMF) driver due to improper input validation. The flaw allows a local attacker to perform out-of-bounds memory writes, potentially elevating privileges to execute code at a higher privilege level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify AMD PMF driver is presentCheck for the presence of AmdPMF.sys in the System32\drivers folder or query installed drivers using 'driverquery /v | findstr -i pmf'Affected if The AMD PMF driver is not installed on the system (not affected)
-
Retrieve driver file versionRight-click AmdPMF.sys and select Properties > Details, or run 'wmic datafile where "name='C:\\Windows\\System32\\drivers\\AmdPMF.sys'" get Version'Affected if Driver version exists and is within the affected version range (need to compare against fixed version once released)
-
Confirm driver is loadedRun 'sc query AmdPMF' or check Device Manager for AMD PMF device under System devicesAffected if Driver service is running or set to auto-start (driver is active and vulnerability is exploitable)
-
Check driver service configurationRun 'sc qc AmdPMF' to view service start type and binary pathAffected if Service is present and configured to run (even if currently stopped, the vulnerable binary exists)
-
Review system event logs for PMF driver errorsOpen Event Viewer > Windows Logs > System and filter for source 'AmdPMF' or Event ID related to driver load failuresAffected if AMD PMF driver events are present (confirms driver is in use)
System is affected if AMD PMF driver is present and the installed version falls within the vulnerable range; once AMD releases the fix, compare your version to the patched version to confirm remediation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the AMD-provided driver update for the PMF framework once released. Until the patch is available, restrict local access to trusted users only and monitor for any suspicious interaction with the PMF driver.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52540 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52540 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data