Open RedirectWeakness · CWE-601

CVE-2025-5256

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SummaryThis advisory addresses an Open Redirection vulnerability in Mautic's user unlocking endpoint. This vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker to redirect legitimate users to malicious websites, potentially leading to phishing attacks or the delivery of exploit kits. Open Redirection via returnUrl Parameter: An Open Redirection vulnerability exists in the /s/action/unlock/user.user/0 endpoint. The returnUrl parameter, intended for post-action redirection, is not properly validated. This allows an attacker to craft a URL that, when clicked by a user, redirects them to an arbitrary external website controlled by the attacker. MitigationUpdate Mautic to a version that properly validates or sanitizes the returnUrl parameter to ensure that redirects only occur to trusted, internal URLs or explicitly whitelisted domains.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Mautic contains an Open Redirection vulnerability in the /s/action/unlock/user.user/0 endpoint where the returnUrl parameter is not validated before use in redirects. An attacker can craft a malicious URL containing an arbitrary external URL in the returnUrl parameter, causing authenticated users to be redirected to attacker-controlled websites for phishing or malware delivery.

MitigationUpdate Mautic to a version that implements proper validation and sanitization of the returnUrl parameter, restricting redirects to trusted internal URLs or an explicit whitelist of allowed domains.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed Mautic version
    Access the Mautic administration dashboard and navigate to Settings > Configuration > System Info, or check the file app/AppConstants.php for the MAUTIC_VERSION constant, or inspect the composer.json file in the Mautic root directory
    Affected if The installed version is any version prior to the fix being applied (compare against official Mautic security advisories for CVE-2025-5256)
  2. Verify the vulnerable endpoint exists
    Check if the route /s/action/unlock/user.user/0 is accessible in the Mautic installation by inspecting the routing configuration files in app/config/routes.php or the equivalent YAML configuration
    Affected if The endpoint exists and is accessible to authenticated users
  3. Inspect returnUrl parameter handling
    Locate the controller handling the /s/action/unlock route (typically in src/Controller/ActionController.php or similar) and examine how the returnUrl query parameter is processed - look for the code that performs the redirect operation
    Affected if The code performs a redirect using the returnUrl parameter without validating it against a whitelist of allowed domains or checking that it is an internal URL
  4. Test for open redirect behavior (if safe to do in non-production)
    With an authenticated session, navigate to a URL such as /s/action/unlock/user.user/0?returnUrl=https://example.com and observe whether the application redirects to the external domain provided
    Affected if The application redirects to the arbitrary URL specified in the returnUrl parameter without any warning or validation

A user is affected if they are running any Mautic version where the returnUrl parameter in /s/action/unlock/user.user/0 is used in redirects without validation, allowing arbitrary external URL redirection.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Mautic to a version that implements proper validation and sanitization of the returnUrl parameter, restricting redirects to trusted internal URLs or an explicit whitelist of allowed domains.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-5256 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-5256 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data