CVE-2025-52567
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGLPI is a Free Asset and IT Management Software package, Data center management, ITIL Service Desk, licenses tracking and software auditing. In versions 0.84 through 10.0.18, usage of RSS feeds or external calendars when planning is subject to SSRF exploit. The previous security patches provided since GLPI 10.0.4 were not robust enough for certain specific cases. This is fixed in version 10.0.19.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGLPI versions 0.84 through 10.0.18 contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the planning feature when processing RSS feeds or external calendars. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of URLs used to fetch external content, allowing attackers to make the server request arbitrary internal or external resources. Previous security patches since version 10.0.4 were incomplete for certain edge cases.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 0.84, < 10.0.19CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed GLPI versionLocate the version.php file in the GLPI root directory and read the $CFG_GLPI['version'] variable, or access the Setup > General > System Information page in the web interfaceAffected if Version is 0.84 through 10.0.18 inclusive
-
Verify planning module is enabledLog in as administrator, navigate to Setup > Plugins or check the main menu for the Planning option. Alternatively, query the database table glpi_plugins for planning-related entries or check glpi_profiles for planning permissionsAffected if Planning module appears in the menu or database shows it as active
-
Check for configured RSS feedsNavigate to Tools > RSS feeds in the web interface, or query the database: SELECT * FROM glpi_rssfeeds WHERE 1=1Affected if Any RSS feeds are configured and active
-
Check for external calendar integrationsNavigate to Setup > External links or check user preferences for calendar synchronization settings. Query the database: SELECT * FROM glpi_externallinks WHERE link_type LIKE '%calendar%' or check for ical/caldav configurations in glpi_calendars or related tablesAffected if External calendar URLs are configured or calendar synchronization is enabled
You are affected if your GLPI version is between 0.84 and 10.0.18 AND the planning module is active with RSS feeds or external calendar integrations configured
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.19
Upgrade to GLPI version 10.0.19 or later to obtain the complete fix. As an interim measure, disable RSS feeds and external calendar integrations in the planning module until the upgrade can be performed.
10.0.19
- Backup the GLPI database and all files before proceeding with the upgrade
- Download GLPI version 10.0.19 from the official GitHub releases page (github.com/glpi-project/glpi/releases) or from the official glpi-project.org website
- Extract the new version files to replace the current GLPI installation
- Run the upgrade by navigating to the GLPI URL in a web browser and following the on-screen upgrade wizard
- Verify that RSS feeds and external calendar planning features function correctly after the upgrade
- Confirm the SSRF vulnerability is mitigated by testing that external calendar/RSS inputs no longer trigger requests to internal network resources
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52567 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52567 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data