CVE-2025-52577
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in Advantech iView that could allow SQL injection and remote code execution through NetworkServlet.archiveTrapRange(). This issue requires an authenticated attacker with at least user-level privileges. Certain input parameters are not properly sanitized, allowing an attacker to perform SQL injection and potentially execute code in the context of the 'nt authority\local service' account.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Advantech iView's NetworkServlet.archiveTrapRange() allows authenticated users with standard privileges to inject malicious SQL through unsanitized input parameters. Successful exploitation enables remote code execution under the 'nt authority\local service' account context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.7.05.7057CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Advantech iView installationLocate the Advantech iView web application by accessing the management interface via browser (commonly on ports 8080, 8443, or 443) or check for iView-related services running on the systemAffected if Advantech iView is present and accessible on the network
-
Identify installed iView versionLog into the iView web interface and navigate to the About or System Information page to view the software version, or inspect version files in the installation directory if accessibleAffected if The installed version is any version prior to 5.7.05.7057
-
Verify NetworkServlet is accessibleAttempt to access the NetworkServlet endpoint (typically at /NetworkServlet with the archiveTrapRange action parameter) through the web interface using a standard user accountAffected if The servlet is reachable and accepts the archiveTrapRange parameter without additional privilege elevation beyond standard user
-
Confirm authentication is enabled but input validation is absentReview the NetworkServlet configuration or source code if accessible to confirm that authentication is required but the archiveTrapRange() method does not sanitize SQL input parametersAffected if Standard users can authenticate and the archiveTrapRange endpoint processes SQL-sensitive parameters without sanitization
A user is affected if Advantech iView is installed with a version lower than 5.7.05.7057 and the NetworkServlet.archiveTrapRange() endpoint is accessible to authenticated standard users
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.7.05.7057
Apply vendor-provided patch when available; until then, implement strict input validation and use parameterized queries to sanitize all user inputs in the affected servlet, and restrict network access to minimize exposure.
Upgrade to Advantech iView version 5.7.05.7057 or later
- 1. Confirm the current iView version by accessing the iView admin interface or checking the installed software version.
- 2. Navigate to the official Advantech support website (www.advantech.com) and locate the downloads or security advisories section.
- 3. Download the patched version 5.7.05.7057 or later of Advantech iView.
- 4. Ensure you have a complete backup of the iView configuration and database before proceeding with the upgrade.
- 5. Stop the iView service to prevent any active connections during the upgrade process.
- 6. Install the updated version 5.7.05.7057, following the vendor's installation documentation.
- 7. After installation, restart the iView service and verify the version has been updated successfully.
- 8. Test the NetworkServlet.archiveTrapRange() functionality to ensure the application operates correctly after the patch.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52577 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52577 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data