FirefoxWeb browser · Mozilla

CVE-2025-5271

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-05-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 139.0 or later.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Previewing a response in Devtools ignored CSP headers, which could have allowed content injection attacks. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 139 and Thunderbird 139.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Firefox and Thunderbird DevTools, the response preview feature ignored Content Security Policy (CSP) headers when rendering content. This meant that even if a server response included CSP headers designed to prevent content injection (like XSS), the DevTools preview would not enforce them, potentially allowing malicious content to execute.

MitigationUpgrade Firefox and Thunderbird to version 139 or later. Until upgraded, avoid previewing untrusted responses in DevTools.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FirefoxWeb browser
Affected:< 139.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Firefox version
    Open Firefox, click the menu button (three horizontal lines), select Help, then About Firefox. The version number is displayed at the top of the window.
    Affected if The version shown is below 139.0 (for example, 138.0, 138.0.1, etc.)
  2. Check Thunderbird version
    Open Thunderbird, click the menu button, select Help, then About Thunderbird. The version number is displayed at the top of the window.
    Affected if The version shown is below 139.0 (for example, 138.x series) and you use Thunderbird's DevTools
  3. Determine if DevTools response preview is in use
    Open DevTools (F12 or Ctrl+Shift+I), go to the Network tab, make a network request, click on a response, and view the Preview tab. This is the response preview feature.
    Affected if You actively use the Network panel preview feature to inspect responses from servers, particularly untrusted ones

You are affected if you run Firefox or Thunderbird version 138.x or lower AND use DevTools to preview network responses, because the preview will not enforce CSP headers from the server.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 139.0 or later
Fixed in 139.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Firefox and Thunderbird to version 139 or later. Until upgraded, avoid previewing untrusted responses in DevTools.

Recommended fix High confidence

Firefox 139.0

  1. Open Firefox and navigate to Menu > Help > About Firefox (or go to about:support)
  2. Check your current Firefox version - if it's below 139.0, an update is needed
  3. In the About Firefox window, click 'Check for updates' or wait for automatic update check
  4. Once Firefox 139.0 or later is available, click 'Update to latest version'
  5. Restart Firefox after the update completes
  6. Verify the update by returning to Menu > Help > About Firefox and confirming version 139.0 or higher
Caveat Standard Firefox major version upgrade - minimal risk; review release notes for any add-on compatibility changes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Firefox Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-5271 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-5271 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data