CVE-2025-52713
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in BoldGrid Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid post-and-page-builder allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid: from n/a through <= 1.27.8.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in BoldGrid Post and Page Builder plugin for WordPress allows attackers to make the server perform unintended requests to internal or external resources, potentially accessing internal services, cloud metadata, or pivoting to internal network targets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify BoldGrid Post and Page Builder is installedLog in to WordPress admin panel and navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, or inspect the /wp-content/plugins/ directory for the boldgrid-post-and-page-builder folderAffected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation
-
Identify installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin, find the BoldGrid Post and Page Builder entry in Plugins list and note the version number displayed, or check the plugin header in /wp-content/plugins/boldgrid-post-and-page-builder/boldgrid-post-and-page-builder.php for 'Version:'Affected if Version number matches or falls within any affected version range if published
-
Confirm SSRF-prone feature is accessibleCheck if the plugin URL import, external content fetch, or media embedding features are available to users, typically found in the plugin settings under Post/Page Builder > Settings or during content creation workflowAffected if Any feature that accepts and fetches external URLs is enabled and accessible to users or contributors
-
Review plugin configuration for URL validation settingsInspect plugin settings pages for any URL allowlisting or validation options, typically found in WordPress admin under BoldGrid > Configuration or similarAffected if No strict allowlist is configured for external URL requests
A WordPress installation is affected if the BoldGrid Post and Page Builder plugin is installed and the version is within the affected range, particularly when URL fetching features are active without strict allowlist controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the BoldGrid Post and Page Builder plugin to the latest version once available. If no update exists, implement URL allowlisting and validate all user-supplied URLs against a strict allowlist of permitted domains/IPs.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52713 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52713 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data