CVE-2025-52728
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in WebCodingPlace Responsive Posts Carousel Pro responsive-posts-carousel-pro allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects Responsive Posts Carousel Pro: from n/a through <= 15.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a PHP Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability in the Responsive Posts Carousel Pro WordPress plugin. The vulnerability allows attackers to manipulate file inclusion paths in PHP include/require statements, potentially executing arbitrary PHP code by including malicious local files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Responsive Posts Carousel Pro plugin is installedCheck the WordPress plugins directory (wp-content/plugins/) for a folder named 'responsive-posts-carousel-pro' or check via WordPress admin dashboard under PluginsAffected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed plugin versionOpen the main plugin PHP file (usually responsive-posts-carousel-pro.php) and locate the version header comment or the version defined in the plugin metadataAffected if The version number is lower than the patched version (contact vendor for current safe version)
-
Check for vulnerable file inclusion code patternsSearch the plugin directory for PHP include/require statements that use user-supplied parameters without proper sanitization. Look for patterns like 'include($_GET[...])' or 'require($_POST[...])' in the plugin filesAffected if Any include/require statements accept unsanitized input from $_GET, $_POST, or similar superglobals
-
Identify exposed entry pointsReview plugin files for AJAX handlers, shortcodes, or callback functions that may accept file path parameters. Check if these are accessible without authentication via wp-admin/admin-ajax.php or similar public endpointsAffected if The plugin exposes file inclusion functionality to unauthenticated or low-privileged users
You are affected if the Responsive Posts Carousel Pro plugin is installed and its file inclusion functionality can be accessed without proper path validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImmediately disable or remove the Responsive Posts Carousel Pro plugin until a patched version is available. If the plugin must remain in use, implement strict input validation and use whitelisting for any file path parameters to prevent path traversal.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52728 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52728 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data