Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2025-52759

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-02
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in UnboundStudio Accordion FAQ allows Reflected XSS. This issue affects Accordion FAQ: from n/a through 2.2.1.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Reflected XSS vulnerability in UnboundStudio Accordion FAQ plugin (versions up to 2.2.1) allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through unsanitized user input that gets reflected in the generated web page.

MitigationUpdate to a patched version when available, or implement proper input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied parameters before rendering in HTML context.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Accordion FAQ plugin installation
    Inspect your website's plugin directory or CMS plugin list for 'Accordion FAQ' by UnboundStudio
    Affected if The plugin is present in the system
  2. Identify installed version number
    Check the plugin header file (usually in the main PHP file) or the plugin metadata displayed in your CMS admin panel for the version string
    Affected if Version cannot be determined or is earlier than the fixed release
  3. Locate user input reflection points
    Review the plugin's PHP files for parameters that accept user input (GET/POST requests) and are output without sanitization - look for functions like $_GET, $_POST, or $_REQUEST used in echo/print statements
    Affected if User-supplied parameters are found in the code and reflected in HTML output without visible escaping functions
  4. Test for reflected XSS in search or FAQ submission fields
    If accessible, submit a benign test payload like <script>alert('test')</script> in the plugin's search bar or FAQ submission form and observe if the script executes in the response
    Affected if The test payload appears unescaped in the rendered page source or executes in the browser
  5. Inspect HTTP response headers and output
    Capture the HTTP response when submitting input through the plugin and examine if Content-Type is set to text/html with the input reflected verbatim
    Affected if Input is reflected back in the HTML body without HTML entity encoding

You are affected if the UnboundStudio Accordion FAQ plugin is installed and user input is reflected in web pages without proper HTML escaping, regardless of the specific version until a patched release is confirmed.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update to a patched version when available, or implement proper input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied parameters before rendering in HTML context.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

2.2.2 or later

  1. 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard
  2. 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins
  3. 3. Locate the 'Accordion FAQ' plugin by UnboundStudio
  4. 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to update to the latest version
  5. 5. Alternatively, download the latest version from the WordPress plugin repository or contact UnboundStudio for the patched release
  6. 6. After updating, verify the plugin is functioning correctly and test that the XSS vulnerability is no longer present

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing1.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,090
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52759 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52759 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data