CVE-2025-52780
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Mohammad Parsa Logo Manager For Samandehi samandehi-logo-manager allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Logo Manager For Samandehi: from n/a through <= 0.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA CSRF vulnerability in the Logo Manager For Samandehi plugin (versions <= 0.5) allows attackers to craft malicious requests that trick authenticated administrators into storing malicious JavaScript code (Stored XSS) through the logo management interface. When other users view pages containing the injected logos, the XSS payload executes in their browsers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Logo Manager For Samandehi plugin is installedAccess your WordPress admin panel, navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins, and search for 'Logo Manager For Samandehi' or inspect the plugin directory wp-content/plugins/ for a folder named similarly to 'logo-manager-for-samandehi'Affected if The plugin is present in the plugins list or directory
-
Check the installed plugin versionIn the WordPress admin plugins list, click on the plugin to view its details, or read the main plugin PHP file (usually in the plugin folder) to find the 'Version' header in the plugin commentsAffected if The version is 0.5 or lower, or if no version number is displayed and the plugin is present
-
Verify the plugin is activeIn Plugins > Installed Plugins, confirm the 'Logo Manager For Samandehi' plugin shows as 'Active'Affected if The plugin is active and the logo management functionality is accessible in the admin dashboard
-
Confirm admin has access to logo management interfaceNavigate to the plugin settings page (typically under Appearance or Settings in the WordPress admin menu) to determine if the logo upload/management interface is accessibleAffected if The logo management interface is accessible to administrator accounts without additional security restrictions
-
Inspect for anti-CSRF protection in plugin codeExamine the PHP files in the plugin folder, specifically looking for nonce validation or wp_nonce_field functions in any form handlers that process logo uploads or settings changesAffected if No nonce verification or CSRF tokens are found in the logo submission processing code
The environment is affected if the Logo Manager For Samandehi plugin is installed, active, version 0.5 or lower, and the logo management interface is accessible without proper CSRF token validation in the code.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens (nonce validation) on all state-changing admin actions and apply proper output encoding/sanitization for all user-supplied logo data before storage and display.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52780 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52780 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data