CVE-2025-52813
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in pietro MobiLoud allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects MobiLoud: from n/a through 4.6.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMissing Authorization vulnerability in pietro MobiLoud allows attackers to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized access to protected functionality or data due to improper authorization checks in the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify MobiLoud installationSearch for MobiLoud application files, services, or web applications running on the environment. Check common paths or use software inventory tools to locate pietro MobiLoud components.Affected if MobiLoud application is present and accessible in the environment
-
Review access control configurationLocate and inspect the application's configuration files (e.g., config files, settings files, security policy files) for access control or permission settings. Look for security level, privilege, or role configuration options.Affected if Access control settings are configured to an insecure level or authorization is disabled/misconfigured
-
Audit endpoint authorization enforcementExamine application source code or API endpoints to determine whether authorization checks are performed before executing protected functions or returning sensitive data. Identify endpoints that should require authentication or specific roles.Affected if Protected endpoints or functions lack proper authorization validation logic or allow unauthenticated access
-
Check for exposed privileged functionalityReview which application functions, administrative features, or data resources are accessible without authentication or without verifying user roles. Test or inspect if sensitive operations can be triggered by unauthorized users.Affected if Protected administrative functions, sensitive data, or privileged operations are accessible without proper authorization credentials or role verification
A user is affected if the MobiLoud application is installed and has misconfigured access control settings that allow unauthorized access to protected functionality or data due to missing authorization checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authorization checks and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) across all application endpoints and functions to ensure users can only access resources they're explicitly permitted to access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52813 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52813 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data