CVE-2025-52952
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in the connectivity fault management (CFM) daemon of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series with MPC-BUILTIN, MPC1 through MPC9 line cards allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to send a malformed packet to the device, leading to an FPC crash and restart, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS). Continued receipt and processing of this packet will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects Juniper Networks: Junos OS: * All versions before 22.2R3-S1, * from 22.4 before 22.4R2. This feature is not enabled by default.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the connectivity fault management (CFM) daemon of Juniper Junos OS on MX Series allows an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to send malformed packets, causing FPC crash and restart and resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 22.2= 22.2= 22.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm you are running Junos OS on an MX Series deviceRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show version' and verify the device model is from the MX Series familyAffected if Device is not an MX Series device - not affected by this specific vulnerability
-
Check your installed Junos OS versionRun 'show version' and note the numeric version (for example, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3, 22.4, etc.)Affected if Version is less than 22.2, equal to 22.2, or equal to 22.4 - these versions are in the affected range
-
Verify if CFM (Connectivity Fault Management) is configuredRun 'show configuration protocols cfm' or check the running configuration for 'protocols cfm' entriesAffected if CFM is not configured at all - the vulnerability cannot be exploited since the CFM daemon must be running
You are affected if you run Junos OS on MX Series, version is < 22.2, = 22.2, or = 22.4, AND CFM (connectivity fault management) is enabled in your configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped22.2
Disable CFM if not required, or upgrade Junos OS to version 22.2R3-S1, 22.4R2 or later to patch the vulnerability.
22.2R3-S1 (or later 22.2R3.x) or 22.4R2 (or later 22.4R2.x) depending on current branch
- 1. Verify the current Junos OS version on the MX Series device using 'show version'.
- 2. Identify the appropriate upgrade path based on current version: if on 22.2 branch, upgrade to 22.2R3-S1 or later; if on 22.4 branch, upgrade to 22.4R2 or later.
- 3. Confirm that the CFM (Connectivity Fault Management) feature is not in use or is properly secured, as this vulnerability requires CFM to be enabled.
- 4. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require FPC restart.
- 5. Download the appropriate Junos OS upgrade package from the Juniper support portal (supportportal.juniper.net).
- 6. Upload the software package to the device using 'file copy' or SCP to /var/tmp/.
- 7. Validate the software package integrity using 'file checksum md5' against the provided checksum.
- 8. Execute the upgrade using 'request system software add /var/tmp/<package-name> reboot'.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52952 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52952 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data