CVE-2025-52960
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input vulnerability in the Session Initialization Protocol (SIP) ALG of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series and SRX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). When memory utilization is high, and specific SIP packets are received, flowd/mspmand crashes. While the system recovers automatically, the disruption can significantly impact service stability. Continuous receipt of these specific SIP packets, while high utilization is present, will cause a sustained DoS condition. The utilization is outside the attackers control, so they would not be able to deterministically exploit this. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX Series and MX Series: * All versions before 22.4R3-S7, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S4, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S5, * from 24.2 before 24.2R2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer copy without size check vulnerability in the SIP ALG of Juniper Junos OS on MX/SRX Series. When memory utilization is high and specific SIP packets are received, a buffer overflow causes the flowd/mspmand processes to crash, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 22.4= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify device is MX or SRX seriesRun 'show chassis hardware' or check device model via 'show system information'Affected if Device is not an MX or SRX series - the vulnerability only affects these platforms
-
Check installed Junos OS versionRun 'show version' and compare the version number to affected ranges: 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, or any version below 22.4Affected if Version matches 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, or is below 22.4 - these are the vulnerable versions
-
Confirm SIP ALG is enabledRun 'show security alg sip' to check SIP ALG statusAffected if SIP ALG is enabled - the buffer overflow only occurs when SIP ALG processes the malicious packets
-
Check for recent flowd or mspmand process crashesRun 'show system processes extensive' and review system logs for recent process crashes using 'show log messages | match flowd|mspmand'Affected if Recent crashes of flowd or mspmand processes are present, especially under high memory conditions
Device is affected if it is an MX/SRX series running a vulnerable Junos version (22.4, 23.2, 23.4, 24.2, or below 22.4) with SIP ALG enabled and experiencing process crashes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped22.4
Upgrade Junos OS to 22.4R3-S7, 23.2R2-S4, 23.4R2-S5, or 24.2R2 or later. Consider disabling SIP ALG if not required, and monitor memory utilization.
22.4R3-S7 or later (22.4 branch), 23.2R2-S4 or later (23.2 branch), 23.4R2-S5 or later (23.4 branch), or 24.2R2 or later
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade procedure
- Backup the current Junos OS configuration using 'request system configuration rescue save' or equivalent
- Download the appropriate fixed Junos OS version for your platform (MX Series or SRX Series): 22.4R3-S7 or later for 22.4 branch, 23.2R2-S4 or later for 23.2 branch, 23.4R2-S5 or later for 23.4 branch, or 24.2R2 or later for 24.2 branch
- Upload the new Junos OS image to the device using 'request system software add <package>' or via Web UI
- Reboot the device to apply the new software version using 'request system reboot'
- After reboot, verify the new version is running using 'show version'
- Verify that the SIP ALG is functioning properly and no crashes are occurring
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52960 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52960 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data