CVE-2025-52964
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Reachable Assertion vulnerability in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). When the device receives a specific BGP UPDATE packet, the rpd crashes and restarts. Continuous receipt of this specific packet will cause a sustained DoS condition. For the issue to occur, BGP multipath with "pause-computation-during-churn" must be configured on the device, and the attacker must send the paths via a BGP UPDATE from a established BGP peer. This issue affects: Junos OS: * All versions before 21.4R3-S7, * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S5, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2. Junos OS Evolved: * All versions before 21.4R3-S7-EVO, * from 22.3 before 22.3R3-S3-EVO, * from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S5-EVO, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-EVO, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-EVO.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reachable assertion in the Routing Protocol Daemon (rpd) causes a crash and restart when processing a specific BGP UPDATE packet. The attack requires the attacker to be an established BGP peer and the target device to have BGP multipath with 'pause-computation-during-churn' configured, resulting in a Denial of Service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.4= 21.4= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4< 21.4= 21.4= 22.3= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Junos OS/Evolved versionRun 'show version' or 'show version detail' and note the software version installedAffected if The version matches one of the affected ranges: < 21.4, = 21.4, = 22.3, = 22.4, = 23.2, or = 23.4
-
Verify BGP is configuredRun 'show configuration protocols bgp' to confirm BGP is enabled and has peer configurationsAffected if BGP is not configured or no peers are defined - the vulnerability requires an established BGP peer relationship
-
Confirm BGP multipath is enabledRun 'show configuration protocols bgp' and look for 'multipath' under the BGP configuration or peer/group levelAffected if The 'multipath' option is not present in the BGP configuration - the flaw requires multipath to be enabled
-
Check for pause-computation-during-churn settingRun 'show configuration protocols bgp' and search for the 'pause-computation-during-churn' option under the multipath hierarchyAffected if The 'pause-computation-during-churn' feature is explicitly configured under the BGP multipath settings - this is the specific configuration that enables the attack surface
A device is affected if it runs a Junos version in the specified list AND has an established BGP peer AND has BGP multipath enabled AND has the 'pause-computation-during-churn' feature configured, allowing a malicious BGP peer to trigger the assertion and cause a crash/restart loop.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.4
Apply the vendor-supplied software updates for the affected Junos OS/Evolved versions. As a workaround, consider disabling the 'pause-computation-during-churn' feature if operationally feasible, or strictly control BGP peer access to trusted endpoints.
21.4R3-S7 / 22.3R3-S3 / 22.4R3-S5 / 23.2R2 / 23.4R2 (or respective -EVO variants for Junos OS Evolved)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS or Junos OS Evolved version running on the device using 'show version'
- 2. Determine which version branch (21.4, 22.3, 22.4, 23.2, or 23.4) the device is currently running
- 3. For 21.4 branch: upgrade to 21.4R3-S7 or later (21.4R3-S7-EVO for Evolved)
- 4. For 22.3 branch: upgrade to 22.3R3-S3 or later (22.3R3-S3-EVO for Evolved)
- 5. For 22.4 branch: upgrade to 22.4R3-S5 or later (22.4R3-S5-EVO for Evolved)
- 6. For 23.2 branch: upgrade to 23.2R2 or later (23.2R2-EVO for Evolved)
- 7. For 23.4 branch: upgrade to 23.4R2 or later (23.4R2-EVO for Evolved)
- 8. If running a version not listed in affected versions, verify exact version is not vulnerable before proceeding
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52964 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52964 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data