CVE-2025-52981
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the flow processing daemon (flowd) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX1600, SRX2300, SRX 4000 Series, and SRX5000 Series with SPC3 allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial-of-Service (DoS). If a sequence of specific PIM packets is received, this will cause a flowd crash and restart. This issue affects Junos OS: * all versions before 21.2R3-S9, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3-S11, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R3-S7, * 22.4 versions before 22.4R3-S6, * 23.2 versions before 23.2R2-S4, * 23.4 versions before 23.4R2-S4, * 24.2 versions before 24.2R2. This is a similar, but different vulnerability than the issue reported as CVE-2024-47503, published in JSA88133.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the flow processing daemon (flowd) of Juniper Junos OS on SRX1600, SRX2300, SRX4000/5000 Series with SPC3. An unauthenticated network attacker can trigger a flowd crash and restart by sending a specific sequence of PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast) packets. The vulnerability stems from improper error handling where the code fails to check for unusual or exceptional conditions properly.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 21.2= 21.2= 21.4= 22.2= 22.4= 23.2= 23.4= 24.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your SRX model and SPC3 statusRun 'show chassis hardware' or 'show system information' to confirm the device is an SRX1600, SRX2300, SRX4000, or SRX5000 Series with SPC3 module installedAffected if Device is not one of these models or does not have SPC3 - the vulnerability does not apply
-
Check installed Junos OS versionRun 'show version' and locate the Junos OS version string (for example, 22.4R1)Affected if Version matches one of the affected releases: any version before 21.2, or exactly 21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2
-
Determine if PIM is enabledRun 'show protocols pim' or check the configuration with 'show configuration protocols pim'Affected if PIM is enabled and accepting traffic - only then can the malicious packet sequence be delivered
-
Check flowd crash historyRun 'show system core-dumps' or 'show log messages' for recent flowd crash events, especially around times of unexpected flowd restartsAffected if Flowd has recently crashed or restarted without an explicit admin action
You are affected if you run an affected Junos version (21.2, 21.4, 22.2, 22.4, 23.2, 23.4, or 24.2, or any version before 21.2) on an SPC3-equipped SRX1600/2300/4000/5000 with PIM protocol enabled, and your flowd has exhibited unexplained crashes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped21.2
Apply the appropriate Junos OS software update (21.2R3-S9, 21.4R3-S11, 22.2R3-S7, 22.4R3-S6, 23.2R2-S4, 23.4R2-S4, or 24.2R2 or later) to resolve this issue. As a temporary workaround, consider filtering untrusted PIM traffic at network borders.
Upgrade to 21.2R3-S9+ / 21.4R3-S11+ / 22.2R3-S7+ / 22.4R3-S6+ / 23.2R2-S4+ / 23.4R2-S4+ / 24.2R2+ (choose the appropriate branch based on current version)
- 1. Identify the current Junos OS version running on the affected SRX device (SRX1600, SRX2300, SRX4000 Series, or SRX5000 Series with SPC3)
- 2. Based on your current version branch, plan upgrade to the minimum fixed release: for 21.2.x upgrade to 21.2R3-S9 or later; for 21.4.x upgrade to 21.4R3-S11 or later; for 22.2.x upgrade to 22.2R3-S7 or later; for 22.4.x upgrade to 22.4R3-S6 or later; for 23.2.x upgrade to 23.2R2-S4 or later; for 23.4.x upgrade to 23.4R2-S4 or later; for 24.2.x upgrade to 24.2R2 or later
- 3. Before upgrading, back up the current configuration and review the Junos upgrade documentation for your specific hardware platform
- 4. Download the appropriate Junos OS upgrade package from the Juniper Networks support portal (supportportal.juniper.net)
- 5. Upgrade the device during a planned maintenance window since the flowd daemon will restart as part of the upgrade
- 6. After upgrade, verify the new Junos version is installed and the device is operating normally
- 7. Monitor the device for any unusual behavior and verify flowd process stability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-52981 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-52981 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data