CVE-2025-53014
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Versions prior to 7.1.2-0 and 6.9.13-26 have a heap buffer overflow in the `InterpretImageFilename` function. The issue stems from an off-by-one error that causes out-of-bounds memory access when processing format strings containing consecutive percent signs (`%%`). Versions 7.1.2-0 and 6.9.13-26 fix the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImageMagick contains a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the InterpretImageFilename function caused by an off-by-one error. The flaw triggers out-of-bounds memory access when processing format strings containing consecutive percent signs (%%), leading to potential heap corruption and possible remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.9.13-26>= 7.0.0-0, < 7.1.2-0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed ImageMagick versionRun 'convert -version' or 'magick -version' and record the version number displayedAffected if Version is 6.x and less than 6.9.13-26, or version is 7.x and less than 7.1.2-0
-
Confirm which ImageMagick binary is in useRun 'which convert' or 'which magick' to find the executable path, then run the version command from that pathAffected if Multiple ImageMagick installations exist and the vulnerable version is being used
-
Identify use of InterpretImageFilename functionalitySearch ImageMagick usage in scripts, applications, or web interfaces for format strings or filename patterns that use percent signsAffected if ImageMagick processes filenames or format strings containing consecutive percent signs (%%)
-
Review application input handling for ImageMagickExamine how user-supplied filenames or format parameters are passed to ImageMagick, looking for patterns that could include %% sequencesAffected if User-controlled input reaches ImageMagick filename interpretation without sanitization of percent characters
Environment is affected if the installed ImageMagick version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND the system processes image filenames or format strings with consecutive percent signs through the InterpretImageFilename function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.9.13-267.1.2-0
Upgrade ImageMagick to version 7.1.2-0 or 6.9.13-26 or later to resolve the heap buffer overflow. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling or restricting ImageMagick image processing capabilities for untrusted inputs.
ImageMagick 6.9.13-26 (for 6.x branch) or ImageMagick 7.1.2-0 (for 7.x branch)
- Identify your current ImageMagick version using 'convert -version' or 'magick -version'
- If running ImageMagick 6.x (e.g., 6.9.x): upgrade to version 6.9.13-26 or later
- If running ImageMagick 7.x (e.g., 7.0.x or 7.1.x): upgrade to version 7.1.2-0 or later
- Use your system's package manager (apt, yum, dnf, brew, etc.) to install the updated package, e.g., 'apt-get update && apt-get install imagemagick' or 'sudo yum update imagemagick'
- Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed release using 'convert -version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53014 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53014 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data