CVE-2025-53132
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Win32K - GRFX allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in the Windows Win32K GRFX graphics subsystem where concurrent execution with improper synchronization on shared resources allows a local authenticated attacker to exploit timing windows to elevate privileges to higher permission levels.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.10240.21100< 10.0.14393.8330< 10.0.17763.7678< 10.0.19044.6216< 10.0.19045.6216< 10.0.22621.5768< 10.0.22631.5768< 10.0.26100.4851CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build versionOpen Command Prompt and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the exact Windows build numberAffected if The build number is lower than any of these thresholds: 10240.21100 (1507), 14393.8330 (1607), 17763.7678 (1809), 19044.6216 (21h2), 19045.6216 (22h2), 22621.5768 (22h2), 22631.5768 (23h2), 26100.4851 (24h2)
-
Verify Windows edition matches affected product lineRun 'winver' or check System Properties to confirm if the system is Windows 10 1507, 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2 or Windows 11 22h2, 23h2, 24h2Affected if The Windows edition is one of the affected versions listed in the CVE and falls below the corresponding build threshold
-
Confirm patch installation statusOpen Control Panel > Programs > Programs and Features > View installed updates, or run 'wmic qfe list' in Command Prompt to list installed security updatesAffected if No recent security update addressing this Win32K GRFX race condition is installed for the detected Windows version
The system is affected if it runs any of the listed Windows 10 or Windows 11 versions with a build number below the fixed version for that release channel, and the corresponding security patch is not installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.10240.2110010.0.14393.833010.0.17763.7678
Apply the corresponding Microsoft Windows security update that patches the Win32K GRFX race condition vulnerability.
Minimum fixed versions: Windows 10 1507 → 10.0.10240.21100 | Windows 10 1607 → 10.0.14393.8330 | Windows 10 1809 → 10.0.17763.7678 | Windows 10 21h2 → 10.0.19044.6216 | Windows 10 22h2 → 10.0.19045.6216 | Windows 11 22h2 → 10.0.22621.5768 | Windows 11 23h2 → 10.0.22631.5768 | Windows 11 24h2 → 10.0.
- Identify the current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo'
- Determine which Windows 10 or 11 release branch is in use (1507, 1607, 1809, 21h2, 22h2, 11 22h2, 11 23h2, or 11 24h2)
- Compare the current build number against the fixed version for that branch: 10.0.10240.21100 (1507), 10.0.14393.8330 (1607), 10.0.17763.7678 (1809), 10.0.19044.6216 (21h2), 10.0.19045.6216 (22h2), 10.0.22621.5768 (Win11 22h2), 10.0.22631.5768 (Win11 23h2), or 10.0.26100.4851 (Win11 24h2)
- If the current build is below the fixed version, apply the latest Windows security update via Windows Update or download from Microsoft Update Catalog
- Restart the system after applying the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53132 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53132 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data