CVE-2025-53148
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUse of uninitialized resource in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a use of uninitialized resource vulnerability in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS). The vulnerability allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network by leveraging memory or resources that have not been properly initialized before use. The required authorization level is not specified, but the attacker must have some form of authenticated access to the RRAS service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions= r2all versions= r2< 10.0.14393.8330< 10.0.17763.7678< 10.0.20348.3989< 10.0.25398.1791< 10.0.26100.4851CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify RRAS is installedOpen Server Manager, go to Manage > Add Roles and Features, check if 'Remote Access' role with 'Routing' role services is installed. Alternatively, run `Get-WindowsFeature -Name Routing` in PowerShell on Server editions, or check for the RemoteAccess service via `sc query RemoteAccess`.Affected if RRAS is installed and the Windows Server version falls within the affected ranges (Server 2008/2012 all versions; Server 2016 < 10.0.14393.8330; Server 2019 < 10.0.17763.7678; Server 2022 < 10.0.20348.3989; Server 2022 23h2 < 10.0.25398.1791; Server 2025 < 10.0.26100.4851)
-
Confirm Windows Server versionRun `winver`, or execute `systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"` in Command Prompt, or use `Get-ComputerInfo | Select-Object WindowsProductName, WindowsVersion` in PowerShell. Note the exact build number (for example, 10.0.14393.8330).Affected if The installed Windows Server version matches one of the affected product versions and is lower than the corresponding fixed build number.
-
Check if RemoteAccess service is runningOpen Services.msc and locate the 'Remote Access (RRAS)' service, or run `sc query RemoteAccess` in Command Prompt. Verify the service status (RUNNING, STOPPED, etc.).Affected if The RemoteAccess service is running or set to start, making the RRAS interface accessible over the network.
You are affected if RRAS is installed/enabled and your Windows Server version is below the specified build numbers for your product, as the vulnerability requires an active RRAS service to be exploited.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.833010.0.17763.767810.0.20348.3989
Apply the relevant Microsoft security patches for this vulnerability through Windows Update. Additionally, restrict network access to RRAS services to only authorized personnel and ensure proper authentication mechanisms are enforced.
Apply the Microsoft security update containing the fix for CVE-2025-53148 (build thresholds: WS2016 >=10.0.14393.8330, WS2019 >=10.0.17763.7678, WS2022 >=10.0.20348.3989, WS2022 23h2 >=10.0.25398.1791, WS2025 >=10.0.26100.4851)
- Check current Windows Server version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in command prompt
- Open Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update or run 'ms-settings:windowsupdate'
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest security patches
- If running Windows Server 2016/2019/2022, ensure the installed build number is at least 10.0.14393.8330 / 10.0.17763.7678 / 10.0.20348.3989 respectively
- For Windows Server 2022 23h2, ensure build is at least 10.0.25398.1791
- For Windows Server 2025, ensure build is at least 10.0.26100.4851
- Restart the server if prompted to complete the update installation
- Verify the installed updates include the security patch for CVE-2025-53148 by checking Windows Update history
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-53148 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-53148 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data