CVE-2025-5319
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Emit Informatics and Communication Technologies Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. DIGITA Efficiency Management System allows SQL Injection. This issue affects DIGITA Efficiency Management System: through 03022026. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe DIGITA Efficiency Management System contains a critical SQL injection vulnerability allowing attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized user inputs. Successful exploitation could enable unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or complete system compromise. The vulnerability affects all versions through 03022026.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if DIGITA Efficiency Management System is installedSearch for installation directories, check for processes named 'DIGITA' or related executables, review installed software lists on serversAffected if The software is found running or installed on the system
-
Determine the installed version numberCheck application version through its UI (usually in About/Help menus), check installation logs, or query the application directly via its API if availableAffected if The version is 03022026 or any earlier version (all versions through 03022026 are affected)
-
Verify the web interface is accessibleCheck if HTTP/HTTPS ports serving the application are listening (commonly ports 80, 443, or custom web ports); review firewall rules and network configurationsAffected if The web interface is exposed and reachable
-
Identify exposed user input fieldsReview application forms, login pages, search functions, or any parameter acceptors that could receive user-supplied data; use spidering/scanning tools if authorizedAffected if User input fields are present and accessible without sanitization mechanisms
-
Confirm lack of input sanitization or parameterized queriesIf authorized, review application source code or configuration for SQL query handling; check if WAF or input validation layers are present in front of the applicationAffected if No input sanitization, parameterized queries, or protective WAF layer is detected between user inputs and database queries
A user is affected if DIGITA Efficiency Management System version 03022026 or earlier is installed with an accessible web interface containing user input fields that lack SQL injection protections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince the vendor is non-responsive and no patch exists, implement a web application firewall (WAF) in front of the system, disable unnecessary database privileges, and consider isolating the application network segment until a fix is available or alternative software is identified.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation24.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-5319 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-5319 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data